Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-02T19:47:13.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voter Mobilization 101: Presidential Campaign Visits to Colleges and Universities in the 2016 Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Christopher J. Devine Open the ORCID record for Christopher J. Devine [Opens in a new window]
Christopher J. Devine*
Affiliation:
University of Dayton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Presidential candidates frequently hold campaign events on college and university campuses. Yet, the frequency of and motivations for holding these events on-campus has not been subject to systematic empirical analysis. This article analyzes an original database of presidential campaign visits in 2016 to determine how often and why the candidates held their events on-campus. I find that colleges and universities hosted more campaign visits (16.9%) than any other type of venue in 2016. Also, the Democratic candidates apparently used these visits to mobilize young people to register and vote. Democrats (29.5%) visited campuses far more often than Republicans (8.2%), and—unlike Republicans—Democrats were significantly more likely to hold events on-campus, instead of at another venue, as the host-state’s voter registration deadline, its early voting period, or Election Day neared. This research informs scholars’ understanding of the role that young people, as well as colleges and universities, play in American electoral politics.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 261 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Althaus, Scott L., Nardulli, Peter F., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2002. “Candidate Appearances in Presidential Elections, 1972–2000.” Political Communication 19 (1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul A., and Heidemann, Erik D.. 2014. “Changing Strategies in Grassroots Canvassing: 1956–2012.” Party Politics 20 (2): 261–74.10.1177/1354068813509518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1977. “From Life Space to Polling Place: The Relevance of Personal Concerns for Voting Behavior.” British Journal of Political Science 7 (1): 337–60.10.1017/S0007123400001022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Lanhee J., and Reeves, Andrew. 2011. “Turning out the Base or Appealing to the Periphery? An Analysis of County-Level Candidate Appearances in the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” American Politics Research 39 (3): 534–56.10.1177/1532673X10385286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Christopher J. 2018. “Oh, the Places They’ll Go: The Geography and Political Strategy of Presidential Campaign Visits in 2016.” In Studies of Communication in the 2016 Presidential Campaign, ed. Denton, Robert E. Jr., 45–68. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Tedin, Kent L.. 2015. American Public Opinion, 8th Edition. Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and McClurg, Scott D.. 2005. “The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 689–703.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00149.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Alan. 2008. “Boss Rocks the Vote.” Columbus Dispatch, October 5. Accessed November 1, 2018. Available at www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2008/10/05/boss.html.Google Scholar
MacManus, Susan A., and Quecan, Andrew F.. 2008. “Spouses as Campaign Surrogates: Strategic Appearances by Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates’ Wives in the 2004 Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (2): 337–48.Google Scholar
Pelzer, Jeremy. 2016. “Hillary Clinton Draws Record Crowd at Ohio State Rally.” Cleveland.com, October 11. Accessed November 1, 2018. Available at www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/10/hillary_clinton_draws_record_c.html.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2016. “The Parties on the Eve of the 2016 Election: Two Coalitions, Moving Further Apart.” Pew Research Center, September 13. Accessed November 1, 2018. Available at www.people-press.org/2016/09/13/the-parties-on-the-eve-of-the-2016-election-two-coalitions-moving-further-apart.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Nella. 1998. “Hotbeds of Activism: Locations of Student Protest.” Social Problems 45 (2): 205–20.10.2307/3097244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardon, Joe. 2012. “Obama Asks 15,000 at OSU Rally to Believe in Him.” Columbus Dispatch, October 9. Available at www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/10/09/Obama_asks_15x000_at_OSU_rally_to_believe_in_him.html.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 2016. Is Voting for Young People? 3rd Edition. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
West, Darrel M. 1983. “Constituencies and Travel Allocations in the 1980 Presidential Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 27 (3): 515–29.10.2307/2110982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Devine supplementary material

Appendix

Download Devine supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 120.4 KB