Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:04:36.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Sets the Agenda? Participation Asymmetries in the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress in the 116th Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2022

Emily C. Baer Open the ORCID record for Emily C. Baer [Opens in a new window]
Emily C. Baer*
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In January 2019, the House of Representatives voted 418–12 to respond to widespread bipartisan criticism of the inner workings of the legislative branch by creating a Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress. This article examines the leadership, participation, and salience of the Select Committee by key reform stakeholders, including individual members, party factions, leaders, interest groups, and the national media that cover Congress. I identify bifurcated participation patterns that overrepresent the interests of junior members, party leaders, and Democratic Party factions. I also find limited salience of Select Committee activities among key stakeholders. The findings raise normative and theoretical questions about procedural reform and reveal a significant challenge to coalition-building efforts in future sessions of Congress.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 668 - 676
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Axelrod, Tal. 2019. “Jayapal Introduces Bill to Repeal Pay-Go.” The Hill, January 4, https://thehill.com/homenews/house/423972-jayapal-introduces-bill-to-repeal-pay-go.Google Scholar
Baer, Emily. 2017. “Organizing for Reform: The Democratic Study Group and the Role of Party Factions in Driving Institutional Change in the House of Representatives.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Baer, Emily. 2022. “Replication Data for ‘Who Sets the Agenda? Participation Asymmetries in the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress in the 116th Congress.’” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YLTGR8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress . 2021. Available at https://bioguide.congress.gov/.Google Scholar
Butler, Stuart M., and Higashi, Timothy. 2018. “How Can We Take Partisanship out of the Budget Process? The Lessons from this Independent Committee Can Help.” Up Front blog, Brookings Institution, December 19. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2018/12/19/how-can-we-take-partisanship-out-of-the-budget-process-the-lessons-from-this-independent-committee-can-help/.Google Scholar
Caygle, Heather, and Bresnahan, John. 2019. “House Democrats Postpone Vote on Leadership Term Limits.” Politico, February 13. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/13/house-democrats-leadership-term-limits-1168425.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 116th Cong., 1st sess., 2019. Vol. 2, H220–H224: https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2019/01/04/house-section/article/H220-4.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Golshan, Tara. 2019. “The PAYGO Fight Roiling House Democrats, Explained.” Vox, January 3. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/3/18165261/paygo-house-democrats-progressives-medicare.Google Scholar
Government, Efficiency, Accountability, and Reform Task Force. 2020. Power, Practices, Personnel: 100+ Commonsense Solutions to a Better Government. Washington, DC: Republican Study Committee.Google Scholar
Harris, Douglas B., and Nelson, Garrison. 2008. “Middlemen No More? Emergent Patterns in Congressional Leadership Selection.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (1): 49–55.Google Scholar
Jagoda, Naomi. 2019. “Blue Dogs Issue New Call for House Leaders to Abide by Pay-Go Rule.” The Hill, November 25. https://thehill.com/policy/finance/471970-blue-dogs-issue-new-call-for-house-leaders-to-abide-by-pay-go-rule.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Stewart, Charles III. 2013. Fighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey B., Poole, Keith, Rosenthal, Howard, Boche, Adam, Rudkin, Aaron, and Sonnet, Luke. 2022. Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/.Google Scholar
Manning, Jennifer. 2020. Membership of the 116th Congress: A Profile. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
McInnis, Mary, ed. 1966. We Propose: A Modern Congress: Selected Proposals by the House Republican Task Force on Congressional Reform and Minority Staffing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
View, Monitor’s. 2020. “Where Republicans and Democrats Work Together to ‘Fix Congress’; An Under-the-Radar Select Committee Recommends Practical Changes that Can Improve the Way Government Work.” Christian Science Monitor, January 2. https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2020/0102/Where-Republicans-and-Democrats-work-together-to-fix-Congress.Google Scholar
Ramsdell, Molly. 2019. “Former State Legislators in the 116th Congress.” NCSL blog, January 14. https://www.ncsl.org/blog/2019/01/14/former-state-legislators-in-the-116th-congress.aspx.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Post-Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Ruth Bloch. 2017. Building the Bloc. New York : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric, McGhee, Eric, and Sides, John. 2003. “Remaking the House and Senate: Personal Power, Ideology, and the 1970s Reforms.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (3): 297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, Lindsey McPherson. 2020. “House Democrats Eyeing Changes to Legislative Tool.” Gulf Times, December 3. https://www.gulf-times.com/story/679456/House-Democrats-eyeing-changes-to-legislative-tool.Google Scholar
Wright, John. 2000. “Interest Groups, Congressional Reform, and Party Government in the United States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. 2004. On Capitol Hill: The Struggle to Reform Congress and Its Consequences, 1948–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. 2020. Burning down the House: Newt Gingrich, The Fall of a Speaker, and the Rise of the New Republican Party. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar