Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:53:27.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Benzodiazepine withdrawal among chronic daytime users in general practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mark Ashworth  and
Michael King
Mark Ashworth*
Affiliation:
Department of General Practice, UMDS, London SE1 9RT
Michael King
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG
*
Hurley Clinic, Ebenezer House, Kennington Lane, London SE11 4HJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Withdrawal of chronic day-time users from benzodiazepines is rarely attempted in general practice because patients are considered more dependent on their medication than analogous night-time users. Our aim was to evaluate two forms of brief intervention by general practitioners to reduce intake of benzodiazepines in chronic day-time users. A subsidiary aim was the development of a booklet to help patients with benzodiazepine withdrawal.

Type
Original articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , February 1993 , pp. 77 - 78
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 1993

References

Giblin, M. J. & Clift, A. D. (1983) Sleep without drugs. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 33, 628–633.Google ScholarPubMed
King, M. B., Gabe, J., Williams, P. & Rodrigo, E. K. (1990) Long term use of benzodiazepines: the views of patients. British Journal of General Practice, 40, 194–196.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.