Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:34:14.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boundaries for psychotherapists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Kevan R. Wylie*
Affiliation:
Porterbrook Clinic, 75 Osborne Road, Nether Edge, Sheffield S11 9BF, email: mail@porterbrookclinic.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2006

The recent articles on the Kerr/Haslam Inquiry (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2006, 30, 204–206, 207–209) raise important issues. The experience of sexual feelings during psychotherapy and the potentially abusive nature of dual relationships are described in the literature (Reference Pope, Sonne and HolroydPope et al, 1993; Reference SymeSyme, 2003). Breach of boundaries by doctors and therapists working in the field of human sexuality is relatively rare, with 98.7% of 814 UK clinicians responding to a survey having rarely or never been tempted to have sexual relations with a client (with no difference between physicians and non-physicians and no clear gender bias) (Reference Wylie and OakleyWylie & Oakley, 2005).

Sexual and relationship psychotherapists, as members of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy, adhere to a clear code of ethics and practice, which should be openly disclosed and available to all patients under the clinicians’ care. Integrative care involving physical and psychological therapies requires clear protocols and patient guidance, including overt statements with regard to chaperone policy (Reference CarrCarr, 2003).

References

Carr, S.V. (2003) The intimate examination: time for a name change. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 29, 156159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, K. S., Sonne, J. L. & Holroyd, J. (1993) Sexual Feelings in Psychotherapy. New York: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Syme, G. (2003) Dual Relationships in Counselling and Psychotherapy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wylie, K. R. & Oakley, K. (2005) Sexual boundaries in the relationship between clients and clinicians practising sexology in the UK. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 453456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.