Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:57:05.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community interviewing: experiences and recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sue Parkman  and
Sara Bixby
Sue Parkman*
Affiliation:
Researcher
Sara Bixby
Affiliation:
Researcher, PRiSM (Psychiatric Research in Service Measurement), Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AZ
*
∗Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Evaluation studios of community mental health services require the research, often in the form of interviews, to be carried out in private homes which poses a particular set of issues relating to the interview environment and the organisation of the work. This paper describes the experiences of interviewing patients, staff and informal carers as part of an evaluation study of the mental health services in two psychiatric sectors in South London and makes recommendations for more effective community based research.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , February 1996 , pp. 72 - 74
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1996

References

Dayson, D. (1990) The TAPS Project 2. Challenges and pitfalls of community interviewing. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14, 651–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorm, A. F., Henderson, A. S., Scott, R., et al (1994) Do mental health surveys disturb? Further evidence. Psychological Medicine, 24, 233–237.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.