Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:20:38.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compulsory admission to mental hospital in Thailand and England

A visitor's view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

P. Kupituksa ,
J. F. Macmillan  and
K. L. Soothill
P. Kupituksa
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Somdet Chaopraya Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand and Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster
J. F. Macmillan
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham and Honorary Consultant to Academic Unit, All Saints Hospital, Lodge Road, Birmingham B18 5SO
K. L. Soothill
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster, Lancaster
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are national differences relating to compulsory admission to mental hospitals. As a visitor from Thailand, it was of interest to me (PK) to compare procedures relating to admission, treatment and aftercare of the mentally ill in England and Thailand. In Thailand there is no equivalent of the Mental Health Act 1983. Although there are some legal provisions affecting patients' rights in Thai law, there are no legal provisions concerning ‘detained’ patients in mental hospitals.

Type
Articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 13 , Issue 7 , July 1989 , pp. 355 - 357
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1989

References

Soothill, K. L. et al (1981) Social control of deviants in six countries. Medical Science of Law, 21, 31–40.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.