Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:22:33.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Injecting some audit into substance misuse services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Beelin Baxter
Affiliation:
Mill House, Brookfields Hospital, Cambridge CB1 3DF
Stephen Green
Affiliation:
NHSE Anglia and Oxford, 6–12 Capital Drive, Milton Keynes MK14 6QP
Olwen Williams
Affiliation:
Anglia Clinical Audit and Effectiveness Team, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2SP
Woody Caan*
Affiliation:
Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Road, Cambridge CB2 2AH
*
Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The former East Anglia Regional Health Authority initiated a 3-year project beginning in 1993. This aimed to introduce audit skills and to promote sustained audit activity across a diverse group of statutory and independent sector drug and alcohol agencies. Prior to this there had been little interest in audit for this area of care and no good models of practice were available from elsewhere in the NHS which could readily be adapted to the needs of the Anglian services. Eventually 24 agencies collaborated in this project, which introduced a system of reciprocal peer audit between the agencies which was supported by a dedicated facilitator, a programme of auditor training, and an Agency Audit Representative Group to prioritise topics for audit and to agree common standards. Progress was very slow to begin with. By May 1995, 12 agencies had completed an initial audit of 2–4 topics each from a regional menu of 12 priorities. One year later, 12 more services have undertaken such an initial audit and nine out of the original dozen (75%) have completed their first ‘audit cycle’ with a re-audit of the same topics. There has been an increase in the number of agencies meeting all the standards in their chosen topics, and in the number of topics where all standards are met, wherever those topics have been audited. Two new practice guidelines have also been developed by the agency representatives.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Baxter, B. (1995) Auditing Drug and Alcohol Services in the Anglia Region. Milton Keynes: Annual Report for Anglia & Oxford RHA.Google Scholar
Caan, W. (1994) Community psychiatric nursing: drug-use and HIV-risk characteristics. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 1, 49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caan, W. & Crowe, M. (1994) Using readmission rates as indicators of outcome in comparing psychiatric services. Journal of Mental Health, 3, 521524.Google Scholar
Caan, W., Green, S., Haarhoff, G., et al (1996) Organising clinical audit in two small specialities: forensic psychiatry and substance misuse services. In Clinical Audit in Psychiatry, p. 11. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Charities Evaluation Services (1994) Quality Assurance in the Voluntary Sector. London: CES.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1991) Drug Misuse and Dependence. Guidelines on Clinical Management London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1996) The Task Force to Review Services for Drug Misusers. Report from Independent Review of Drug Treatment Services in England. Wetherby: DoH.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. T. (1995) Audit of audit. Auditorium, 2, S–10.Google Scholar
Hager, K. (1993) Audit for Drug Services. London: Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence.Google Scholar
Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence (1991) Drug Services in England and the Impact of the Central Funding Initiative. London: ISDD.Google Scholar
Joint Centre for Education in Medicine (1992) Making Medical Audit Effective. London: JCEM.Google Scholar
Royal College of Nursing (1995) Clinical Guidelines – What You Need to Know. London: RCN.Google Scholar
White Paper (1989) Working for Patients. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.