Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:31:25.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is specialist registrar training in cognitive therapy effective?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Steve Moorhead*
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
Jan Scott
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychological Medicine, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow GL2 0XH
*
Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims and method

This paper describes the characteristics and outcome of the first 20 patients seen by a newly appointed specialist registrar in cognitive therapy. The outcome of the first (cases 1–10) and second (cases 11–20) cohorts were evaluated to assess if training had any impact on clinical effectiveness.

Results

Comorbidity was common, but more patients improved following the intervention (effect size=0.64–1.34). The 25% therapy drop-out rate was comparable with previously reported rates. Four out of five patients who dropped out had Cluster B personality disorders. The two cohorts showed similar baseline characteristics, but the second cohort showed improved outcome (effect size of training=0.89–1.04) and had a significantly shorter course of therapy (P=0.02).

Clinical Implications

Specialist registrar training in cognitive therapy provides experience in treating a wide variety of mental disorders. The routine collection and analysis of clinical and psychometric data helps identify training effectiveness and training needs. The data demonstrate that training was associated with improved patient outcomes.

Type
Original Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561 571.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., et al (1974) The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861 865.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, revised edition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, I., Shea, M. T., Watkins, J. T., et al (1989) National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Program: General effectiveness of treatments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 971 982.Google Scholar
Hollon, S. D. & Kendall, P. C. (1980) Cognitive self-statements in depression: development of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 383 395.Google Scholar
Hyler, S. E., Rieder, R. O., Williams, J. B. W., et al (1988) The personality and diagnostic questionnaire: development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Disorder, 28, 487 503.Google Scholar
Roth, A. & Fonagy, P. (1996) What Works for Whom. A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. & Moorhead, S. (1998) Cognitive therapy training for psychiatrists. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 4, 3 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. & Lushene, R. E. (1970) State Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.Google Scholar
SPSS (1997) Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Version 8.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS.Google Scholar
Weissman, A. (1979) Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A validation study. Dissertation Abstracts International 40, 1389 1390.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.