Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:30:54.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lunacy, insanity, and the purpose of psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Bruce G. Charlton*
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Within psychiatry there are two distinct tendencies. On the one hand there is the tendency for the subject to expand beyond its concern with psychological medicine and encroach upon diverse aspects of society. “The psychiatrist who believes that the phenomena of mental illness can be explained on the basis of a universal theory … finds little difficulty in inflating his theory to explain not only mental disease but also normal human behaviour, interpersonal relations, and ultimately human affairs” (Miller, 1970)

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1990

References

Crow, T. J. (1986) The continuum of psychosis and its implication for the structure of the gene. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 419429.Google Scholar
Lancet (Editorial) (1985) Irritability in psychiatric nosologists. Lancet, ii, 1223.Google Scholar
Miller, H. (1970) Psychiatry: medicine or magic. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 3, 122126.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Culture and Value. (Translated by Winch, Peter.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell: Dated 1946, p. 54e.Google Scholar
Woods, G. (1984) The Myth of Neurosis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.