Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:20:42.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natalie Cobbing Travel Fellowship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

M. Bambrick
M. Bambrick*
Affiliation:
Mental Handicap, Department of Mental Handicap, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH and Aston Hall, Aston-on-Trent, Derbyshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1987–88 I undertook a research project, to look at parental views on sterilisation for their mentally handicapped offspring. This project was prompted by the then recent decision of the High Court in the UK, which authorised the sterilisation of a 17-year-old girl with mental handicap, and created much controversy and debate at the time. Very little was known about the views of parents as a group in the UK on this issue, and hence the decision of our Department of Mental Handicap in Nottingham to explore this area (Bambrick & Roberts, in press).

Type
People and places
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , March 1992 , pp. 161 - 163
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992

References

Bambrick, M. & Roberts, G. E. Sterilisation of people with mental handicap: the views of parents. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research (in press).Google Scholar
Macklin, R. & Gaylin, W. (eds) (1981) Mental Retardation and Sterilisation. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.