Recently, Magnes (Psychiatr Bull 2008; 32: 458–60) conducted a survey of patient attendance posing the question ‘Are out-patient appointments a necessary evil?’ The need for out-patient appointments was both queried Reference Killaspy1 and robustly defended. Reference Holloway2 Frequently, when discussing the role of such appointments the focus is on attendance. Reference Mitchell and Selmes3,Reference Kelly4 However, research addressing other aspects would greatly benefit psychiatry.
We believe that the following issues could be considered: what is the purpose of out-patient appointments? (possible responses: (a) review mental state, adherence, risk, etc.; (b) opportunity for the patients to ask questions; (c) update the GP and/or other services involved; (d) consider referral to other members of the multidisciplinary team or other services); how often should we see patients and for how long? Furthermore, guidance on appropriate discharge procedures would be very helpful.
Finally, we would like to echo Holloway's Reference Holloway2 suggestion that ‘a more nuanced discussion’ on that ‘necessary evil’ is urgently required.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.