Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:46:27.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rise and fall of anti-psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mervat Nasser
Mervat Nasser*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A review is made of the anti-psychiatric movement through its major protagonists, Lacan, Laing, Cooper and Szasz. The ideology was set to challenge the concept of mental illness and question the authority of the psychiatrist and the need for mental health institutions. The anti-psychiatric movement received a lot of attention in the 1970s but is now considered to be of the past and of likely interest to the psychiatric historian. However, the impact of the movement on current psychiatric practice requires further re-examination and appraisal.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 19 , Issue 12 , December 1995 , pp. 743 - 746
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1995

References

Bentall, R. (1993) Thomas Szasz, crazy talk and the myth of mental illness (comment). British Journal of Medical Psychology. 66, 69–76.Google Scholar
Bowie, M. (1987) Freud, Proust, and Lacan, Theory as Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breggin, P. R. (1975) Psychiatry and psychotherapy as political processes. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 29, 3.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. (1971) Psychiatry and Anti-psychiatry. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. (1980) The Language of Madness. London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1971) Madness and Civilisation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975) Surveiller et Punir. Paris: Gallimard. English edition, Discipline and Punish (trans. Sherida, A.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums – essays on the social situations of the mental patients and other inmates. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Jones, K. & Fowles, A. J. (1984) Ideas on Institutions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kennedy, I. (1980) Great Caution Must be Exercised in Visiting the Status of Mentally Ill on Anyone. The Reith Lectures: Unmasking Medicine.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1947) Propos sur la Causalité Psychique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1968) “The Mirror phase”, the functions of language in psychoanalysis. New Left Review, 5.Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1967) The Politics of Experience. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1969) The Dialectics of Liberation (with D. Cooper). New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1971) Sanity, Madness and the Family (with A. Esterson). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Szasz, T. (1972) The Myth of Mental Illness. Foundations of a theory of personal construct London: Granada Publishing.Google Scholar
Szasz, T. (1972) Bad habits are not diseases. Lancet, ii, 128.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.