Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:10:21.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supervised discharge order: the first year in the South and West Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Anna Knight
Affiliation:
Fromeside Unit, Blackberry Hill Hospital, Bristol
David Mumford*
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bristol, 41 St Michael's Hill, Bristol BS2 8DZ
Bob Nichol
Affiliation:
Mental Health Act Commissioner/Approved Social Worker, Tetbury, Gloucestershire
*
Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information was collected from responsible medical officers (RMOs) in the South and West Region who had used the new supervised discharge order (SDO) (Section 25a) during the first year of its operation. Twenty-nine patients were placed on a SDO by 19 consultants. Most patients suffered from schizophrenia. In a third of cases, medication was stipulated as a requirement, although this is not legally permissible. RMOs commented on the time-consuming process of applying for a SDO and felt it had limited value because of the lack of sanctions.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.