Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:57:19.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comorbidity of anxiety disorders and depression: does it affect course and outcome?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

H.U. Wittchen  and
C.A. Essau
H.U. Wittchen
Affiliation:
University of Mannheim, Department of Clinical Psychology Mannheim Unit of Evaluation Research, Max-Planck-Institute for Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2, 8000 Munich 40, FRG
C.A. Essau
Affiliation:
Unit of Evaluation Research, Max-Planck-Institute for Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2, 8000 Munich 40, FRG
Get access

Summary

The comorbidity of anxiety disorders and depression, and its effect on course and outcome was examined by using data from the Munich Follow-up Study (MFS). The MFS is a prospective 7 year follow-up study in both a clinical sample of originally 291 former inpatients as well as a representative sample (N = 657) from the general population. Diagnoses were based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) not using the optional DSM-III exclusion rules. Based on earlier studies the temporal relationship of diagnoses was examined by using the age of onset and recency codings of the DIS, correcting for inaccuracies in patients’ judgement. The results showed: 1), Comorbidity seems to be a rather frequent and stable phenomenon in clinical and epidemiological samples. The comorbidity rates of the DIS/DSM-III diagnoses, amounted to about 50% in the epidemiological and 75% in the clinical sample. 2), The majority of the subjects with both disorders indicated an onset of anxiety disorders before that of a major depressive syndrome. None of the cases developed a major depressive episode prior to an anxiety disorder. 3), A less favorable course and outcome was generally found for subjects with both disorders (anxiety and depression), although the predictive value of the diagnostic grouping was meager. Clear differences were found for “pure” disorders (anxiety only, depression only) in the clinical and epidemiological sample. 4), Regardless of whether a depressive episode was present at the time of the follow-up investigation, the mixed group had the worst outcome of all other comparative groups.

Résumé

Résumé

Les données de l'étude longitudinale de Munich (MFS ou Munich Follow-up Study) ont permis d'étudier la comorbidité des troubles anxieux et de la dépression et le retentissement de cette comorbidité sur l'evolution des pathologies. La MFS est une étude prospective sur 7 ans portant à la fois sur un échantillon représentatif de 657 sujets et sur un échantillon clinique à l'origine de 291 patients ayant fait un séjour en milieu hospitaller. Les diagnostics ont été portés a l'aide du DIDS (Diagnostic Interview Schedule), sans utiliser les règles d'exclusion optionnelles du DSM III. Les principaux résultats sont les suivants: (1) La comorbidité est un phénomène relativement fréquent et stable à la fois dans les échantillons cliniques et dans ceux des études épidémiologiques. La comorbidité des diagnostics DIS/DSM III est d'environ 50% dans les échantillons des études épidémiologiques et de 75% dans les échantillons cliniques, même en excluant les troubles de la personnalité classés sur l'axe II. (2) Chez la majorité des sujets présentant les deux types de troubles l'installation des troubles anxieux précède celle des troubles dépressifs, aucun des sujets n'ayant présenté d'épisode dépressif majeur avant les troubles anxieux. (3) L'évolution se révèle moins favorable pour les sujets présentant à la fois les troubles anxieux et dépressif. (4) Le groupe correspondant à la pathologie mixte (anxiété + dépression) a la moins bonne évolution de tous les groupes, et ce qu'un épisode dépressif ait été présent ou non au moment de l'enquête longitudinale.

Keywords

epidemiologycomorbiditydepressionanxietyépidémiologiecomorbiditédépressionanxiété
Type
Original article
Information
Psychiatry and Psychobiology , Volume 4 , Issue 5 , 1989 , pp. 315 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angst, J. & Dobler-Mikola, A. (1985) The Zurich Study VI. A continuum from depression to anxiety disorders. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Neurol. Sci. 235, 179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, D.H., DiNardo, P.A., Vermilyea, B.B., Vermilyea, J. & Blanchard, E.B. (1986) Comorbidity and depression among the anxiety disorders: issues in diagnosis and classification. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 174, (2), 63–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breier, A., Charney, D.S. & Honinger, G.R. (1984) Major depression in patients with agoraphobia and panic disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 41, 1129–1135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, J.H., Burke, J.D., Gruenberg, E., Holzer, C.E., Rae, D.S., George, L.K.Karno, M., Stoltzman, R., McEvoy, L. & Nestadt, G. (1984) Exclusion criteria of DSM-III. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 41, 983–989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buller, R., Maier, W. & Benkert, O. (1986) Clinical subtypes in panic: prospective validity. J . Affect. Dis. 11, 105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, J.D., Wittchen, H.U., Regier, D.A. & Sartorius, N. (1988) Extracting information from diagnostic interviews of co-occurrence of symptoms of anxiety and depression.In: Comorbidity of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms. NIMH Rockville, MD (in press)Google Scholar
Clancy, J., Noyes, R., Hoenk, P.R. & Slymen, D.J. (1978) Secondary depression in anxiety neurosis. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 166 (12), 846–850CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R.L., Fleiss, J.L. & Cohen, J. (1976) A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatry disurbance. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 33, 766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunhaus, L., Rabin, D. & Greden, J.F. (1986) Simultaneous panic and depressive disorders. J. Clin. Psychiatry 47, 4–7Google Scholar
Hecht, H., Faltermaier, T. & Wittchen, H.U. (1987) Social Interview Schedule (SIS).Halbstrukturiertes Interview zur Erfassung der aktuellen sozialpsychologischen Situation. Roderer, RegensburgGoogle Scholar
Hecht, H. & Wittchen, H.U. (1988) The frequency of social dysfunction in a general population sample and in patients with mental disorders. A comparison using the Social Interview Schedule (SIS). Soc. Psychiatry Epidemiol. 23, 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, P.C. & Butcher, J.N. (1982) Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychiatry. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Krieg, J.C., Bronisch, T., Wittchen, H.U. & von Zerssen, D. (1987) Anxiety disorders: a long-term prospective and retrospective follow-up study of former in-patients suffering from an anxiety neurosis or phobia. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 76, 36–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leckman, J.F., Weissman, M.M., Merikangas, K.R., Pauls, D.L. & Prusoff, B.A. (1983) Panic disorder increases risk of major depression, alcoholism, panic, and phobic disorders in affectively ill families. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 40, 1055–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, I.M., Rubin, R.I., Pecknold, J.C., Rifkin, A., Swinson, R.P., Lydiard, R.B., Burrows, G.D., Noyes, R. & DuPont, R.L. (1988) Secondary depression in panic disorder and agoraphobia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 45, 437–443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paykel, E.S., Weissman, M.M. & Prusoff, B.A. (1978) Social maladjustment and severity of depression. Comp. Psychiatry 19, 121–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raskin, M., Pecke, H.V.S., Dickman, W. & Pinsker, H. (1982) Panic and generalized anxiety disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 39, 687–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, D.V. & Scheehan, M.S. (1982) The classification of anxiety and hysterical states. I. Historal review and empirical delineation. J. Clin. Psychopharmacology 2, 235–243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M.M., Leckman, J.F., Merikangas, K.R., Gammon, G.D. & Prusoff, B.A. (1984) Depressive and anxiety disorders in parents and children. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 41, 845–852CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M.M. & Merikangas, K.R. (1986) The epidemiology of anxiety and panic disorders: an update. J. Clin. Psychiatry 47, 6 (suppl.), 11–17Google ScholarPubMed
Wittchen, H.U. (1986) Epidemiology of panic attacks and panic disorders.In: Panic and Phobias. I — Empirical Evidence of Theoretical Models and Long-Term Effecs of Behavioral Treatments (Hand, I. & Wittchen, H.U., eds.), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 18–28Google Scholar
Wittchen, H.U. (1987) Chronic difficulties and life events in the long term course of affective and anxiety disorders: result from the Munich Follow-up Study.In: From Social Class to Social Stress - New Developments in Psychiatric Epidemiology (Angermeyer, M.C., ed.), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 176–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittchen, H.U. (1988a) Zum Spontanverlauf unbehandelter Fälle mit Angstörungen bzw. Depressionen.In: Verläufe behandelter und unbehandelter Depressionen und Angstsörungen (Wittchen, H.U. & von Zerssen, D., eds), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 252–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittchen, H.U. (1988b) Natural course and spontaneous remissions of untreated anxiety disorders – results of the Munich Follow-up Study (MFS).In: Panic and Phobias. II Treatments and Variables Affecting Course and Outcome (Hand, I. & Wittchen, H.U., eds.), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 3–17Google Scholar
Wittchen, H.U., Burke, J.D., Semler, G., Pfister, H., von Cranach, M. & Zaudig, M. (1989) Recall and dating reliability of psychiatric symptoms – test-retest reliability of time related symptom questions in a standardized psychiatric interview (CIDI/DIS). Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 46, 437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittchen, H.U., Hecht, H., Zaudig, M., Vogl, G., Semler, G. & Pfister, H. (1988) Häufigkeit and Schwere psychischer Störungen in der Bevölkerung - Eine epidemiologische Feldstudie.In: Verläufe behandelter und unbehandelter Depressionen und Angststörungen (Wittchen, H.U. & von Zerssen, D., eds.), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 232–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittchen, H.U. & von Zerssen, D. (ed) (1988) Verläufe behandelter und unbehandelter Depressionen und Angststörungen. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.