Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:51:23.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Kinetic and Dynamic Characteristics of Benzodiazepines in the Treatment of Anxiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

L.F. Fabre*
Affiliation:
Fabre Clinic, 5503 Crawford, Houston, Texas77004, USA
Get access

Summary

Benzodiazepines are assumed to cause drowsiness and sedation. Rating scales such as the Massachusetts General Hospital Sedation Scale and the Morning Evaluation of Drug Induced Sedation Scale allow testing of this hypothesis and assessment of the effects of benzodiazepines. We performed a five-week study of prazepam in 63 anxious outpatients. Plasma levels of desmethyldiazepam were assessed weekly. Placebo was given the first week, followed by active drug for three weeks, and placebo the final week. One group received prazepam 30 mg/h, the other received prazepam 10 mg three times per day. Drowsiness-sedation and anxiolytic efficacy were assessed at baseline and weekly. Plasma desmethyldiazepam levels were similar in both treatment groups. Efficacy was profound in both groups. Drowsiness-sedation measured high at baseline and decreased significantly (P=0.05) over the 3 weeks when active drug was administered. Sedation decreased by as much as 40%. Sleep was improved with prazepam, and this may have resulted in decreased drowsiness. We conclude that anxious outpatients have significant levels of drowsiness-sedation and that treatment with benzodiazepines reduces the occurrence of this symptom.

Résumé

Résumé

Les benzodiazépines sont censées provoquer une somnolence et une sédation. Des échelles d’évaluation telles que la Massachusetts General Hospital Sedation Scale (échelle de sédation du Massachussets General Hospital) et la Morning Evaluation of Drug Induced Scale (échelle d’évaluation matinale de la sédation due à l’action des médicaments) permettent de vérifier cette hypothèse et de mesurer les effets des benzodiazépines. Nous avons étudié les effets du prazépam pendant une période de 5 semaines sur 63 patients de consultation externe. Les niveaux plasmatiques de deméthyldiazépam furent mesurés chaque semaine. On administra un placebo la première semaine, suivi d’un médicament actif pendant trois semaines et, enfin, d’un placebo durant la dernière semaine. Un groupe reçut 30 mg de prazépam à l’heure du coucher tandis que l’autre groupe recevait 10 mg de prazépam trois fois par jour. La somnolence et la sédation, de même que l’efficacité anxiolytique furent évaluées au point de départ et chaque semaine. Les niveaux plasmatiques de deméthyldiazepam étaient semblables dans les deux groupes de traitement. L’efficacité était très bonne dans les deux groupes. La somnolence et la sédation étaient élevées lors de l’évaluation initiale, puis elles ont diminué de manière significative (P = 0,05) au cours des trois semaines d’administration du médicament actif. La sédation a diminué dans une proportion allant jusqu ’à 40%. Le prazépam eut des effets bénéfiques sur le sommeil, ce qui contribua peut-être a réduire la somnolence. Nous concluons que les patients anxieux de consultation externe ont des niveaux importants de somnolence et de sédation et que le traitement aux benzodiazépines réduit la fréquence de ce symptôme.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
Boulenger, J.P. & Bisserbe, J.C. (1988) Cognitive pertubations and anxiety pathology: clinical description and evidence. Aspects Cliniques et Cognitifs de l’Anxiété, 19Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (1983) Concentrations plasmatiques et activité clinique des benzodiazépines. Encéphale IX, 59 B-65 BGoogle Scholar
Byck, R. (1975) Drugs in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th edn. (Goodman, L.S. & Gilman, A., eds.), MacMillan Publishing Co. Inc., 191Google Scholar
Fabre, L.F.Johnson, P.A. & Greenblatt, D.J. (1984) Drowsiness and sedation levels in anxious neurotic outpatients. Psychopharmacol. Bull 20 (1) 128-136Google ScholarPubMed
Fontaine, R.Annable, L.Chouinard, G. & Ogilvie, R.I. (1983) Bromazepam and diazepam in generalized anxiety : a placebo-controlled study with measurement of drug plasma concentrations. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 3, 8087CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt, D.J.Ochs, H.R. & Lloyd, B.L. (1980) Entry of diazepam and its major metabolite into cerebrospinal fluid. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 70, 8993CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt, D.J.Divoll, M.Harmatz, J.S.MacLaughlin, D.S. & Shader, R.I. (1981) Kinetics and clinical effects of flurazepam in young and elderly noninsomniacs. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 30, 475486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, D.J.Harmatz, J.S.Dorsey, C. &Shader, R.I. (1986) Comparative kinetic and dynamic effects of alprazolam, lorazepam, prazepam, and placebo. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 196Google Scholar
Shader, R.I.Georgotas, A.Greenblatt, D.J.Harmatz, J.S. & Allen, M.D. (1978) lmpaired absorption of desmethyldiazepam from chlorazepate by magnesium aluminum hydroxide. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 24, 308315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P. (1974) Benzodiazepine Bonanza. Lancet ii, 709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolkowitz, O.M. & Weingartner, H. (1988) Defining cognitive changes in depression anxiety: a psychobiological analysis. Aspects Cliniques et Cognitifs de l’Anxiété 20Google Scholar
Zung, W.W.K.Mendels, J.Tillman, S. & MacDonald, J. (1986) A comparison of the incidence of sedation in anxious outpatients treated with diazepam and prazepam. Cur. Ther. Res. 39 (4), 480489Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.