Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:30:19.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education, gender and cognitive performance in a 62-year-old normal population: results from the Turva Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

R. Portin ,
S. Saarijärvi ,
M. Joukamaa  and
R. K. R. Salokangas
R. Portin*
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Turku, Finland
S. Saarijärvi
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Turku, Finland
M. Joukamaa
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Turku, Finland
R. K. R. Salokangas
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Turku, Finland
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr R. Portin, Department of Neurology, University of Turku, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Four WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) subtests, and tasks of memory and cognitive control were administered to a population sample of 143 men and 179 women. Subjects with a minor advantage in years of education out-performed those with only primary schooling. Gender-related effects were also remarkable. Whereas the general abilities were equal in the genders, women out-performed men on recall of word pairs and objects, on verbal cognitive control and on Digit Symbol. In contrast, men excelled on Trail Making A, and on Block Design. The findings emphasize the need for age norms by gender and education for cognitive tests.

Type
Brief Communication
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 1295 - 1298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altman, D. G. & Gardner, M. J. (1989). Calculating confidence intervals for means and their differences. In Statistics with Confidence. Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines (ed. Gardner, M. J. & Altman, D. G.), pp. 20–27. British Medical Journal: London.Google Scholar
Ardila, A. & Rosselli, M. (1989). Neuropsychological characteristics of normal aging. Developmental Neuropsychology 5, 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, C. M., Kokmen, E., Offord, K. P. & Kurland, L. T. (1992). Lack of association between Alzheimer's disease and education, occupation, marital status, or living arrangement. Neurology 42, 2063–2068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, A. L. (1963). Revised Visual Retention Test. Psychological Corporation: New York.Google Scholar
Bleecker, M. L., Bolla-Wilson, K., Agnew, J. & Meyers, D. A. (1988). Age-related sex differences in verbal memory. Journal of Clinical Psychology 44, 403–411.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E. & Ober, B. A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Research Edition. Manual. Psychological Corporation: New York.Google Scholar
Ganguli, M., Ratcliff, G., Huff, F. J., Belle, S., Kancel, M. J., Fisher, R., Seaberg, E. C. & Kuller, L. H. (1991). Effects of age, gender, and education on cognitive tests in a rural elderly community sample: norms from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elders Survey. Neuroepidemiology 10, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geffen, G., Moar, G. J., O'Hanlon, A. P., Clark, C. R. & Geffen, L. B. (1990). Performance measures of 16- to 86-year-old males and females on the auditory verbal learning test. Clinical Neuropsychologist 4, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph, No. 21. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, 2nd edn.Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Houx, P. J., Vreeling, F. W. & Jolles, J. (1991). Rigorous health screening reduces age effect on memory scanning task. Brain and Cognition 15, 246–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joukamaa, M., Saarijärvi, S. & Salokangas, R. K. R. (1993). The Turva project: retirement and adaptation in old age. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie 26, 170–175.Google ScholarPubMed
Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American 09, 81–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological Assessment, 2nd edn.Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J. A. & Graves, A. B. (1993). Education and other socioeconomic determinants of dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 43, S39–S44.Google Scholar
Rapp, P. R. & Amaral, D. V. (1992). Individual differences in the cognitive and neurobiological consequences of normal aging. Trends in Neurosciences 15, 340–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revonsuo, A., Portin, R., Koivikko, L., Rinne, J. O. & Rinne, U. K. (1993). Slowing of information processing in Parkinson's disease. Brain and Cognition 21, 87–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosselli, M. & Ardila, A. (1991). Effects of age, education, and gender on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure. Clinical Neuropsychologist 5, 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1990). SAS/STAT User's Guide, 4th edn. vols 1 and 2. SAS: Gary, NC.Google Scholar
Satz, P. (1993). Brain reserve capacity on symptom onset after brain injury: a formulation and review of evidence for threshold theory. Neuropsychology 7, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Psychological Corporation: New York.Google Scholar
Youngjohn, J. R., Larrabee, G. J. & Crook, T. H. III (1993). New age- and education corrected norms for the Benton Visual Retention Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist 7, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed