Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:13:19.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of psychiatric training in the use of descriptive terms among psychiatrists in the British Isles1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

J. R. M. Copeland  and
A. J. Gourlay
J. R. M. Copeland
Affiliation:
From the U.S.–U.K. Diagnostic Project, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London
A. J. Gourlay
Affiliation:
From the U.S.–U.K. Diagnostic Project, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Three videotapes of diagnostic interviews were rated by psychiatrists at several different centres in the British Isles. Audiences were asked to use a number of rating schedules including a list of 116 technical psychiatric terms. They were also asked to make a provisional diagnosis. The influence of the psychiatrists' concepts of normality and the type of training and other factors such as age on the perception and quantitative assessment of psychiatric symptoms and the use of technical terms is discussed. Maudsley-trained raters tended to see fewer symptoms of all kinds in all three patients, while Glasgow psychiatrists made more ratings of affective symptoms–both manic and depressive—on two of the three tapes. Dublin raters use more ‘dynamic’ terms in their daily routine than do raters from the United Kingdom. Raters over 40 years of age tended to use ‘dynamic’ terms more often than raters under 40 years. Raters trained in university departments differed only slightly in the terms they used from those trained in area mental hospitals. This study points to the problems of psychiatric communication within one culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 101 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Copeland, J. R. M., Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., and Gourlay, A. J. (1971). Differences in usage of diagnostic labels amongst psychiatrists in the Biritish Isles. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 629–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleiss, J. L. (1970). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Cooper, J. E., Gourlay, A. J., Copeland, J. R. M., Sharpe, L., and Gurland, B. J. (1971). Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists. Archives of General Psychiatry, 25, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandifer, M. G. Jr., Hordern, A., and Green, L. M. (1970). The psychiatric interview: the impact of the first three minutes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 968–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed