Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:31:18.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure of schizotypal personality traits: a cross-national study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

E. Fonseca-Pedrero ,
M. Debbané ,
J. Ortuño-Sierra ,
R. C. K. Chan ,
D. C. Cicero ,
L. C. Zhang ,
C. Brenner ,
E. Barkus ,
R. J. Linscott  and
T. Kwapil
...Show all authors
E. Fonseca-Pedrero*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain Center for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, Spain
M. Debbané
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
J. Ortuño-Sierra
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain
R. C. K. Chan
Affiliation:
Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, CAS key Laboratory of Mental Health, Beijing, China
D. C. Cicero
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
L. C. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
C. Brenner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
E. Barkus
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
R. J. Linscott
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
T. Kwapil
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA
N. Barrantes-Vidal
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
A. Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Louisiana, LA, USA
A. Raine
Affiliation:
Departments of Criminology, Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
M. T. Compton
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
E. B. Tone
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
J. Suhr
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
J. Muñiz
Affiliation:
Center for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, Spain Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
A. Fumero
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
S. Giakoumaki
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
I. Tsaousis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
A. Preti
Affiliation:
Genneruxi Medical Center, Cagliari, Italy
M. Chmielewski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA
J. Laloyaux
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway NORMENT - Norwegian Center of Excellence for Mental Disorders Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
A. Mechri
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Department, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
M. A. Lahmar
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Department, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
V. Wuthrich
Affiliation:
Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
F. Larøi
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway NORMENT - Norwegian Center of Excellence for Mental Disorders Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
J. C. Badcock
Affiliation:
Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
A. Jablensky
Affiliation:
Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: E. Fonseca-Pedrero, University of La Rioja, C/Luis de Ulloa, s/n, Edificio VIVES; C.P: 26002, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain. (Email: eduardo.fonseca@unirioja.es)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Schizotypal traits are considered a phenotypic-indicator of schizotypy, a latent personality organization reflecting a putative liability for psychosis. To date, no previous study has examined the comparability of factorial structures across samples originating from different countries and cultures. The main goal was to evaluate the factorial structure and reliability of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) scores by amalgamating data from studies conducted in 12 countries and across 21 sites.

Method

The overall sample consisted of 27 001 participants (37.5% males, n = 4251 drawn from the general population). The mean age was 22.12 years (s.d. = 6.28, range 16–55 years). The SPQ was used. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Multilevel CFA (ML-CFA) were used to evaluate the factor structure underlying the SPQ scores.

Results

At the SPQ item level, the nine factor and second-order factor models showed adequate goodness-of-fit. At the SPQ subscale level, three- and four-factor models displayed better goodness-of-fit indices than other CFA models. ML-CFA showed that the intraclass correlation coefficients values were lower than 0.106. The three-factor model showed adequate goodness of fit indices in multilevel analysis. The ordinal α coefficients were high, ranging from 0.73 to 0.94 across individual samples, and from 0.84 to 0.91 for the combined sample.

Conclusions

The results are consistent with the conceptual notion that schizotypal personality is a multifaceted construct and support the validity and utility of SPQ in cross-cultural research. We discuss theoretical and clinical implications of our results for diagnostic systems, psychosis models and cross-national mental health strategies.

Keywords

Factorial validityPsychosis riskpsychosisschizotypal personalityschizotypySPQ
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , February 2018 , pp. 451 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn. revised) (DSM-III-R). American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Badcock, JC, Dragovic, M (2006). Schizotypal personality in mature adults. Personality and Individual Differences 40, 77–85.Google Scholar
Barrantes-Vidal, N, Grant, P, Kwapil, T (2015). The role of schizotypy in the study of the etiology of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S408-S416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrantes-Vidal, N, Gross, G, Sheinbaum, T, Mitjavila, M, Ballespí, S, Kwapil, TR (2013). Positive and negative schizotypy are associated with prodromal and schizophrenia-spectrum symptoms. Schizophrenia Research 145, 50–55.Google Scholar
Bora, E, Arabaci, LE (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of schizotypal personality traits in university students. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 20, 339–345.Google Scholar
Brown, TA (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2nd edn. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Byrne, B (2012). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Chen, WJ, Hsiao, CK, Lin, CCH (1997). Schizotypy in community samples: the three-factor structure and correlation with sustained attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106, 649–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, MW-L, Leung, K, Au, K (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37, 522–541.Google Scholar
Chmielewski, M, Watson, D (2008). The heterogeneous structure of schizotypal personality disorder: item-level factors of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and Their associations with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, dissociative tendencies, and normal personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 117, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicero, DC (2016). Measurement Invariance of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire in Asian, Pacific Islander, White, and Multiethnic Populations. Psychological Assessment 28, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicero, DC, Martin, EA, Becker, TM, Docherty, AR, Kerns, JG (2014). Correspondence between psychometric and clinical high risk for psychosis in an undergraduate population. Psychological Assessment 26, 901–915.Google Scholar
Cohen, A, Fonseca-Pedrero, E (in press). Towards a schizotypy core: convergence and divergence of two empirically-derived self-report measures from a nonclinical sample. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology.Google Scholar
Cohen, A, Mohr, C, Ettinger, U, Chan, RCK, Park, S (2015). Schizotypy as an organizing framework for social and affective sciences. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S427-S435.Google Scholar
Cohen, AS, Matthews, RA, Najolia, GM, Brown, LA (2010). Toward a more psychometrically sound brief measure of schizotypal traits: introducing the SPQ-Brief Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders 24, 516–537.Google Scholar
Cohen, J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Compton, MT, Goulding, SM, Bakeman, R, McClure-Tone, EB (2009). Confirmation of a four-factor structure of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire among undergraduate students. Schizophrenia Research 111, 46–52.Google Scholar
Debbané, M, Eliez, S, Badoud, D, Conus, P, Flückiger, R, Schultze-Lutter, F (2015). Developing psychosis and its risk states through the lens of schizotypy. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S396-S407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debbané, M, Mohr, C (2015). Integration and development in schizotypy research: an introduction to the special supplement. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S363–S365.Google Scholar
Dumas, P, Bouafia, S, Gutknecht, C, Saoud, M, Dalery, J, d'Amato, T (2000). [Validation of the French version of the Raine Schizotypal Personality Disorder Questionnaire – categorial and dimensional approach to schizotypal personality traits in a normal student population]. Encephale 26, 23–29.Google Scholar
Dunn, TJ, Baguley, T, Brunsden, V (2014). From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology 105, 399–412.Google Scholar
Ettinger, U, Mohr, C, Gooding, D, Cohen, A, Rapp, A, Haenschel, C, Park, S (2015). Cognition and brain function in schizotypy: a selective review. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S417-S426.Google Scholar
Everett, KV, Linscott, RJ (2015). Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S465–S474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca Pedrero, E, Debbané, M (2017). Schizotypal traits and psychotic-like experiences during adolescence: an update. Psicothema 29, 5–17.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E, Debbané, M, Schneider, M, Badoud, D, Eliez, S (2016a). Schizotypal traits in adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: validity, reliability and risk for psychosis. Psychological Medicine 46, 1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca-Pedrero, E, Fumero, A, Paino, M, de Miguel, A, Ortuño-Sierra, J, Lemos Giraldez, S, Muñiz, J (2014). Schizotypal personality questionnaire: new sources of validity evidence in college students. Psychiatry Research 219, 214–220.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E, Gooding, D, Debbané, M, Muñiz, J (2016b). Psychopathology: psychosis assessment and high-risk paradigms. In The ITC International Handbook of Testing and Assessment (ed. Bartram, D.), pp. 147–170. Oxford University Press: UK.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E, Lemos-Giráldez, S, Paino, M, Villazón-García, U, Muñiz, J (2009). Validation of the schizotypal personality questionnaire brief form in adolescents. Schizophrenia Research 111, 53–60.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E, Ortuño-Sierra, J, Sierro, G, Daniel, C, Cella, M, Preti, A, Mohr, C, Mason, OJ (2015). The measurement invariance of schizotypy in Europe. European Psychiatry 30, 837–844.Google Scholar
Fossati, A, Raine, A, Carretta, I, Leonardi, B, Maffei, C (2003). The three-factor model of schizotypal personality: invariance across age and gender. Personality and Individual Differences 35, 1007–1019.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P, Carpenter, WT, Woods, SW, McGlashan, TH (2014). Attenuated psychosis syndrome: ready for DSM-5.1? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 10, 155–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, GM, Mellin, J, Silvia, PJ, Barrantes-Vidal, N, Kwapil, TR (2014). Comparing the factor structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales and the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 5, 397–405.Google Scholar
Hu, L-T, Bentler, PM (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
IBM Corp Released (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp: Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
Kelleher, I, Cederlöf, M, Lichtenstein, P (2014). Psychotic experiences as a predictor of the natural course of suicidal ideation: a Swedish cohort study. World Psychiatry 13, 184–188.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS, McGuire, M, Gruenberg, AM, O'Hare, A, Spellman, M, Walsh, D (1993). The Roscommon Family Study: III. Schizophrenia-related personality disorders in relatives. Archives of General Psychiatry 50, 781–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KS, Myers, J, Torgersen, S, Neale, MC, Reichborn-Kjennerud, T (2007). The heritability of cluster A personality disorders assessed by both personal interview and questionnaire. Psychological Medicine 37, 655–665.Google Scholar
Kwapil, TR, Barrantes-Vidal, N (2015). Schizotypy: looking back and moving forward. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S366-S373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwapil, TR, Gross, GM, Silvia, PJ, Barrantes-Vidal, N (2013). Prediction of psychopathology and functional impairment by positive and negative schizotypy in the Chapmans’ ten-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122, 807–815.Google Scholar
Lahmar, ML, Gassab, L, Beltaief, F, Mechri, A (2014). Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the schizotypal personality questionnaire in Tunisian university students. Tunisie Medicale 92, 318–322.Google Scholar
Lenzenweger, MF (2010). Schizotypy and Schizophrenia: The View from Experimental Psychopathology. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Liddle, PF (1987). The symptoms of chronic schizophrenia. A re-examination of the positive-negative dichotomy. British Journal of Psychiatry 151, 145–151.Google Scholar
Linscott, RJ (2013). The taxonicity of schizotypy: does the same taxonic class structure emerge from analyses of different attributes of schizotypy and from fundamentally different statistical methods? Psychiatry Research 210, 414–421.Google Scholar
Linscott, RJ, van Os, J (2013). An updated and conservative systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence on psychotic experiences in children and adults: on the pathway from proneness to persistence to dimensional expression across mental disorders. Psychological Medicine 43, 1133–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, O (2015). The assessment of schizotypy and its clinical relevance. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, S374-S385.Google Scholar
Meehl, PE (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist 17, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, LK, Muthén, BO (1998–2012). Mplus User's Guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Nuevo, R, Chatterji, S, Verdes, E, Naidoo, N, Arango, C, Ayuso-Mateos, JL (2012). The continuum of psychotic symptoms in the general population: a cross-national study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 38, 475–485.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2011). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (http://www.R-project.org): Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Raine, A (1991). The SPQ: a scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin 17, 555–564.Google Scholar
Raine, A (2006). Schizotypal personality: neurodevelopmental and psychosocial trajectories. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2, 291–326.Google Scholar
Raine, A, Benishay, D (1995). The SPQ-B: a brief screening instrument for schizotypal personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders 9, 346–355.Google Scholar
Raine, A, Reynolds, C, Lencz, T, Scerbo, A, Triphon, N, Kim, D (1994). Cognitive-perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganized features of schizotypal personality . Schizophrenia Bulletin 20, 191–201.Google Scholar
Reynolds, CA, Raine, A, Mellingen, K, Venables, PH, Mednick, SA (2000). Three-factor model of schizotypal personality: invariance across culture, gender, religious affiliation, family adversity, and psychopathology. Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 603–618.Google Scholar
Schimanski, ID, Mouat, KL, Billinghurst, BL, Linscott, RJ (2017). Preliminary evidence that schizophrenia liability at age 15 predicts suicidal ideation two years later. Schizophrenia Research 181, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefanis, NC, Smyrnis, N, Avramopoulos, D, Evdokimidis, I, Ntzoufras, I, Stefanis, CN (2004). Factorial composition of self-rated schizotypal traits among young males undergoing military training. Schizophrenia Bulletin 30, 335–350.Google Scholar
Tsaousis, I, Zouraraki, C, Karamaouna, P, Karagiannopoulou, L, Giakoumaki, SG (2015). The validity of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire in a Greek sample: tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Comprehensive Psychiatry 62, 51–62.Google Scholar
Vollema, MG, Hoijtink, H (2000). The multidimensionality of self-report schizotypy in a psychiatric population: an analysis using multidimensional Rasch models. Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, EE, Fernandez, F, Snelling, M, Barkus, E (2016). Genetic consideration of schizotypal traits: a review. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1769.Google Scholar
World Medical Association (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association 310, 2191–2194.Google Scholar
Wuthrich, VM, Bates, TC (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the three-factor structure of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and Chapman schizotypy scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 87, 292–304.Google Scholar
Yu, CY, Muthén, BO (2002). Evaluation of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Categorical and Continuous Outcomes (Technical Report). UCLA, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Zumbo, BD, Gadermann, AM, Zeisser, C (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 6, 21–29.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fonseca-Pedrero supplementary material

Fonseca-Pedrero supplementary material

Download Fonseca-Pedrero supplementary material(File)
File 53.2 KB