Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:05:07.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are there distinct cognitive and motivational sub-groups of children with ADHD?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

Rikke Lambek*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Edmund Sonuga-Barke
Affiliation:
Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College, London, United Kingdom & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Rosemary Tannock
Affiliation:
University of Toronto & Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
Anne Virring Sørensen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Dorte Damm
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Per Hove Thomsen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
*
Author for correspondence: Rikke Lambek, E-mail: rikkel@psy.au.dk

Abstract

Background

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is proposed to be a neuropsychologically heterogeneous disorder that encompasses two distinct sub-groups, one with executive function (EF) deficits and one with delay aversion (DA). However, such claims have often been based on studies that have operationalized neuropsychological deficits using a categorical approach – using intuitive but rather arbitrary, clinical cut-offs. The current study applied an alternative empirical approach to sub-grouping in ADHD, latent profile analysis (LPA), and attempted to validate emerging subgroups through clinically relevant correlates.

Methods

One-hundred medication-naïve children with ADHD and 96 typically developing children (6–14 years) completed nine EF and three DA tasks as well as an odor identification test. Parents and teachers provided reports of the children's behavior (ADHD and EF). Models of the latent structure of scores on EF and DA tests were contrasted using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). LPA was carried out based on factor scores from the CFA and sub-groups were compared in terms of odor identification and behavior.

Results

A model with one DA and two EF factors best fit the data. LPA resulted in four sub-groups that differed in terms of general level of neuropsychological performance (ranging from high to very low), odor identification, and behavior. The sub-groups did not differ in terms of the relative EF and DA performance. Results in the ADHD group were replicated in the control group.

Conclusions

While EF and DA appear to be dissociable constructs; they do not yield distinct sub-groups when sub-grouping is based on a statistical approach such as LPA.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedard, AC and Tannock, R (2008) Anxiety, methylphenidate response, and working memory in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders 11, 546557.Google Scholar
Bergwerff, CE, Luman, M, Weeda, WD and Oosterlaan, J (2017) Neurocognitive profiles in children with ADHD and their predictive value for functional outcomes. Journal of Attention Disorders. Published online 30 January 2017. doi:10.1177/1087054716688533Google Scholar
Bitsakou, P, Antrop, I, Wiersema, JR and Sonuga-Barke, EJ (2006) Probing the limits of delay intolerance: preliminary young adult data from the delay frustration task (DeFT) Journal of Neuroscience Methods 151, 3844.Google Scholar
Brydges, CR, Reid, CL, Fox, AM and Anderson, M (2012) A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence 40, 458469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, KP and Anderson, DR (2004) Multimodal inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 33, 261304.Google Scholar
Coghill, DR, Seth, S and Matthews, K (2014) A comprehensive assessment of memory, delay aversion, timing, inhibition, decision making and variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: advancing beyond the three-pathway models. Psychological Medicine 44, 19892001.Google Scholar
DiStefano, C and Kamphaus, RW (2006) Investigating subtypes of child development: a comparison of cluster analysis and latent class cluster analysis in typology creation. Educational and Psychological Measurement 66, 778794.Google Scholar
Doty, RL (2001) The Brief Smell Identification Test Administration Manual. Haddon Heights: Sensonics Inc.Google Scholar
Fair, DA, Bathula, D, Nikolas, MA and Nigg, JT (2012) Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 67696774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraone, SV, Asherson, P, Banaschewski, T, Biederman, J, Buitelaar, JK, Ramos-Quiroga, JA, Rohde, LA, Sonuga-Barke, EJS, Tannock, R and Franke, B (2015) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nature Reviews: Disease Primers 1, 15020.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghanizadeh, A, Bahrani, M, Miri, R and Sahraian, A (2012) Smell identification in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Investigation 9, 150153.Google Scholar
Gioia, GA, Isquith, PK, Guy, SC and Kenworthy, L (2000) Behavior Rating of Executive Function. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Gomez, R, Gomez, RM, Winther, J and Vance, A (2014) Latent profile analysis of working memory performance in a sample of children with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 42, 13671379.Google Scholar
Goodman, R, Ford, T, Richards, H, Gatward, R and Meltzer, H (2000) The development and well-being assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 41, 645656.Google Scholar
Hackman, DA, Gallop, R, Evans, GW and Farah, MJ (2015) Socioeconomic status and executive function: developmental trajectories and mediation. Developmental Science 18, 686702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagemeier, J, Woodward, MR, Rafique, UA, Amrutkar, CV, Bergsland, N, Dwyer, MG, Benedict, R, Zivadinov, R and Szigeti, K (2016) Odor identification deficit in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease is associated with hippocampal and deep gray matter atrophy. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 255, 8793.Google Scholar
Huizinga, M, Dolan, CV and van der Molen, MW (2006) Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia 44, 20172036.Google Scholar
Huizinga, M and Smidts, DP (2011) Age-related changes in executive function: a normative study with the Dutch version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychology 17, 5166.Google Scholar
Huyser, C, Veltman, DJ, Wolters, LH, de Haan, E and Boer, F (2011) Developmental aspects of error and high-conflict-related brain activity in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: a fMRI study with a flanker task before and after CBT. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 52, 12511260.Google Scholar
IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Karalunas, SL and Huang-Pollock, CL (2011) Examining relationships between executive functioning and delay aversion in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 40, 837847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karsz, FR, Vance, A, Anderson, VA, Brann, PG, Wood, SJ, Pantelis, C and Brewer, WJ (2008) Olfactory impairments in child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 69, 14621468.Google Scholar
Killgore, WDS, Mcbride, SA, Killgore, DB, Balkin, TJ and Kamimori, GH (2008) Baseline odor identification ability predicts degradation of psychomotor vigilance during 77 hours of sleep deprivation. International Journal of Neuroscience 118, 12071225.Google Scholar
Kuntsi, J, Oosterlaan, J and Stevenson, J (2001) Psychological mechanisms in hyperactivity: I. Response inhibition deficit, working memory impairment, delay aversion, or something else? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 42, 199210.Google Scholar
Lo, Y, Mendell, NR and Rubin, DB (2001) Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88, 767778.Google Scholar
Manly, T, Robertson, IH, Anderson, V and Nimmo-Smith, I (1999) Test of Everyday Attention For Children: TEA-Ch. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Marco, R, Miranda, A, Schlotz, W, Melia, A, Mulligan, A, Muller, U, Andreou, P, Butler, L, Christiansen, H, Gabriels, I, Medad, S, Albrecht, B, Uebel, H, Asherson, P, Banaschewski, T, Gill, M, Kuntsi, J, Mulas, F, Oades, R, Roeyers, H, Steinhausen, HC, Rothenberger, A, Faraone, SV and Sonuga-Barke, EJ (2009) Delay and reward choice in ADHD: an experimental test of the role of delay aversion. Neuropsychology 23, 367380.Google Scholar
Miyake, A, Friedman, NP, Emerson, MJ, Witzki, AH and Howerter, A (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 41, 49100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mostert, JC, Hoogman, M, Onnink, AMH, van Rooij, D, von Rhein, D, van Hulzen, KJE, Dammers, J, Kan, CC, Buitelaar, JK, Norris, DG and Franke, B (2015) Similar subgroups based on cognitive performance parse heterogeneity in adults with ADHD and healthy controls. Journal of Attention Disorders. Published online 14 September 2015. doi: 10.1177/1087054715602332.Google ScholarPubMed
Muthén, LK and Muthén, BO (1998–2016) Mplus User's Guide, 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Nigg, JT, Willcutt, EG, Doyle, AE and Sonuga-Barke, EJ (2005) Causal heterogeneity in attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: do we need neuropsychologically impaired subtypes? Biological Psychiatry 57, 12241230.Google Scholar
Raftery, AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 25, 111163.Google Scholar
Rajendran, K, O'Neill, S, Marks, DJ and Halperin, JM (2015) Latent profile analysis of neuropsychological measures to determine preschoolers’ risk for ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 56, 958965.Google Scholar
Reitan, RM (1971) Trail making test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 33, 575581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romanos, M, Renner, TJ, Schecklmann, M, Hummel, B, Roos, M, von Mering, C, Pauli, P, Reichmann, H, Warnke, A and Gerlach, M (2008) Improved odor sensitivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry 64, 938940.Google Scholar
Rommelse, NNJ, van der Meer, JMJ, Hartmann, CA and Buitelaar, JK (2016) Cognitive profiling useful for unraveling cross-disorder mechanisms: support for a step-function endophenotype model. Clinical Psychological Science 4, 957970.Google Scholar
Schecklmann, M, Schaldecker, M, Aucktor, S, Brast, J, Kirchgäßner, K, Mühlberger, A, Warnke, A, Gerlach, M, Fallgatter, AJ and Romanos, M (2011) Effects of methylphenidate on olfaction and frontal and temporal brain oxygenation in children with ADHD. Journal of Psychiatric Research 45, 14631470.Google Scholar
Sjöwall, D, Roth, L, Lindqvist, S and Thorell, LB (2013) Multiple deficits in ADHD: executive dysfunction, delay aversion, reaction time variability, and emotional deficits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54, 619627.Google Scholar
Solanto, MV, Abikoff, H, Sonuga-Barke, E, Schachar, R, Logan, GD, Wigal, T, Hechtman, L, Hinshaw, S and Turkel, E (2001) The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in AD/HD: a supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 29, 215228.Google Scholar
Sonuga-Barke, E, Bitsakou, P and Thompson, M (2010) Beyond the dual pathway model: evidence for the dissociation of timing, inhibitory, and delay-related impairments in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 49, 345355.Google Scholar
Sonuga-Barke, EJ (2002) Psychological heterogeneity in AD/HD-a dual pathway model of behaviour and cognition. Behavioural Brain Research 130, 2936.Google Scholar
Sonuga-Barke, EJ, Taylor, E, Sembi, S and Smith, J (1992) Hyperactivity and delay aversion: I. the effect of delay on choice. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines 33, 387398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonuga-Barke, EJS, Dalen, L and Remington, B (2003) Do executive deficits and delay aversion make independent contributions to preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms? American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 42, 13351342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, J, Schuck, S, Mann, M, Carlson, C, Hartman, C, Sergeant, J, et al. (2001) Over-identification of extreme behaviour in evaluation and diagnosis of ADHD/HKD. (http://www.adhd.net) (Accessed 1 May 2006).Google Scholar
Toplak, ME, West, RF and Stanovich, KE (2013) Do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54, 131143.Google Scholar
van Hulst, BM, de Zeeuw, P and Durston, S (2015) Distinct neuropsychological profiles within ADHD: a latent class analysis of cognitive control, reward sensitivity and timing. Psychological Medicine 45, 735745.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D (2003) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-4th Edition (WISC-IV®). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Willcutt, EG, Doyle, AE, Nigg, JT, Faraone, SV and Pennington, BF (2005) Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry 57, 13361346.Google Scholar
Williams, BR, Ponesse, JS, Schachar, RJ, Logan, GD and Tannock, R (1999) Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology 35, 205213.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lambek et al supplementary material

Lambek et al supplementary material 1

Download Lambek et al supplementary material(File)
File 154.2 KB