Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:48:30.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The assessment of parenting using the Parental Bonding Instrument: two or three factors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

E. MURPHY ,
C. R. BREWIN  and
L. SILKA
E. MURPHY
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London; and University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
C. R. BREWIN
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London; and University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
L. SILKA
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London; and University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background. The Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) is a widely used measure of parenting, and is usually used to measure two parenting dimensions, care and over-protection. However, there is disagreement in the research literature about whether the PBI is best used as a two-factor or a three-factor measure.

Method. PBI scores from 583 US and 236 UK students were factor analysed to assess whether a three-factor solution was more satisfactory than a two-factor solution.

Results. A three-factor (care, denial of psychological autonomy and encouragement of behavioural freedom) solution was found to be more satisfactory than a two-factor solution. Using the three-factor solution, group differences that were not apparent with the two-factor solution were identified and it was found that the parenting behaviours associated with depression could be more accurately identified.

Conclusion. The authors suggest that with modifications, the PBI could be used to measure three parenting variables (care, denial of psychological autonomy and encouragement of behavioural freedom), which would allow greater accuracy of prediction and a greater understanding of underlying processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 1997 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)