Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:39:42.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated specialist assessment of older people and predictors of care-home admission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2006

PAUL CLARKSON
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
DAN VENABLES
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
JANE HUGHES
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
ALISTAIR BURNS
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
DAVID CHALLIS
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, UK

Abstract

Background. Effective community-based care for older people requires the integration of assessment approaches by old age psychiatry, geriatric medicine and social services care management. This study examines the value of such collaboration in the assessment of older people at risk of entering care homes.

Method. A randomized controlled trial of integrated assessment (care management with additional clinical assessment by old age psychiatrist or geriatrician) versus care management assessment only, for older people at risk of care-home admission. Older people's characteristics, physical and cognitive functioning, depression, behaviour and quality of care measures were recorded at assessment and 6 months. Differences in clinicians' and care managers' recommendations and placement rates between experimental and control groups were analysed. Logistic regression, examining associations between different needs-related characteristics and the likelihood of care-home admission, was used to characterize placement decisions.

Results. Clinicians recommended fewer older people for placement than did care managers in their usual assessments (a reduction of 85%). This did not, however, translate into a reduction in actual numbers of placements, although placements were delayed in those receiving the integrated assessment. Placements of those receiving the integrated assessment were influenced more by clinical factors, most notably cognitive impairment, which clinicians detected more readily than care managers.

Conclusions. In this at-risk group, integrated assessment offers a means of potentially both delaying care-home admissions and taking account of a wider range of factors in placement decisions. Such an approach is viewed as an important policy goal both in the UK and internationally.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)