Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:05:58.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A method for decreasing patients' medication errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

P. Ley ,
V. K. Jain  and
C. E. Skilbeck
P. Ley*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Barnsley and District General Hospital, Regional Neurology and Neurosurgery Unit, Newcastle General Hospital
V. K. Jain
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Barnsley and District General Hospital, Regional Neurology and Neurosurgery Unit, Newcastle General Hospital
C. E. Skilbeck
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Barnsley and District General Hospital, Regional Neurology and Neurosurgery Unit, Newcastle General Hospital
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr P. Ley, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Eighty anxious and eighty depressed patients were assigned randomly to receiving one of three versions of an information leaflet about their medication, or to receiving no leaflet at all.

Mean medication errors were reduced from 15 to 4% by provision of suitably constructed leaflets.

The results show the practical importance of informing patients about their medication and of paying attention to the difficulty level of any leaflets issued.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , February 1977 , pp. 599 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bradshaw, P. W., Ley, P., Kincey, J. A. & Bradshaw, J. (1975). Recall of medical advice: comprehensibility and specificity. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 14, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klare, G. R. (1963). The Measurement of Readability. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Ley, P. (1972). Comprehension, memory, and the success of communications with the patient. Journal of the Institute of Health Education 10, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, P. (1973). The measurement of comprehensibility. Journal of the Institute of Health Education 11, 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, P. (1974). Communication in the clinical setting. British Journal of Orthodontics 1, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ley, P. & Spelman, M. S. (1967). Communicating with the Patient. Staples Press: London.Google Scholar
Ley, P., Goldman, M., Bradshaw, P. W., Kincey, J. A. & Walker, C. M. (1972). The comprehensibility of some X-ray leaflets. Journal of the Institute of Health Education 10, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, P., Bradshaw, P. W., Eaves, D. & Walker, C. M. (1973). A method for increasing patients' recall of information presented by doctors. Psychological Medicine 3, 217–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovius, J., Lovius, B. J. & Ley, P. (1973). Comprehensibility of the literature given to children at a dental hospital. Journal of Public Health and Dentistry 33, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw Hill: New York.Google Scholar