Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:30:47.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reappraising the long-term course and outcome of psychotic disorders: the AESOP-10 study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

C. Morgan ,
J. Lappin ,
M. Heslin ,
K. Donoghue ,
B. Lomas ,
U. Reininghaus ,
A. Onyejiaka ,
T. Croudace ,
P. B. Jones  and
R. M. Murray
...Show all authors
C. Morgan*
Affiliation:
Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK
J. Lappin
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
M. Heslin
Affiliation:
Centre for Economics of Mental and Physical Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
K. Donoghue
Affiliation:
Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
B. Lomas
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK
U. Reininghaus
Affiliation:
Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
A. Onyejiaka
Affiliation:
Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
T. Croudace
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
P. B. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
R. M. Murray
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
P. Fearon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
G. A. Doody
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK
P. Dazzan
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr C. Morgan, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Box P063, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. (Email: craig.morgan@kcl.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Studies of the long-term course and outcome of psychoses tend to focus on cohorts of prevalent cases. Such studies bias samples towards those with poor outcomes, which may distort our understanding of prognosis. Long-term follow-up studies of epidemiologically robust first-episode samples are rare.

Method

AESOP-10 is a 10-year follow-up study of 557 individuals with a first episode of psychosis initially identified in two areas in the UK (South East London and Nottingham). Detailed information was collated on course and outcome in three domains (clinical, social and service use) from case records, informants and follow-up interviews.

Results

At follow-up, of 532 incident cases identified, at baseline 37 (7%) had died, 29 (6%) had emigrated and eight (2%) were excluded. Of the remaining 458, 412 (90%) were traced and some information on follow-up was collated for 387 (85%). Most cases (265, 77%) experienced at least one period of sustained remission; at follow-up, 141 (46%) had been symptom free for at least 2 years. A majority (208, 72%) of cases had been employed for less than 25% of the follow-up period. The median number of hospital admissions, including at first presentation, was 2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–4]; a majority (299, 88%) were admitted a least once and a minority (21, 6%) had 10 or more admissions. Overall, outcomes were worse for those with a non-affective diagnosis, for men and for those from South East London.

Conclusions

Sustained periods of symptom remission are usual following first presentation to mental health services for psychosis, including for those with a non-affective disorder; almost half recover.

Keywords

AESOP-10 studycourse and outcomepsychotic disordersrecoveryremission
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 44 , Issue 13 , October 2014 , pp. 2713 - 2726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, NC, Carpenter, WT Jr., Kane, JM, Lasser, RA, Marder, SR, Weinberger, DR (2005). Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleuler, M (1978). The Schizophrenia Disorders: Long-Term Patient and Family Studies. Yale University Press: New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Burns, T, Creed, F, Fahy, T, Thompson, S, Tyrer, P, White, I (1999). Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial. UK 700 Group. Lancet 353, 2185–2189.Google Scholar
Ciompi, L (1980). Catamnestic long-term study on the course of life and aging of schizophrenics. Schizophrenia Bulletin 6, 606–618.Google Scholar
Cohen, P, Cohen, J (1984). The clinician's illusion. Archives of General Psychiatry 41, 1178–1182.Google Scholar
Craig, TK, Garety, P, Power, P, Rahaman, N, Colbert, S, Fornells-Ambrojo, M, Dunn, G (2004). The Lambeth Early Onset (LEO) Team: randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of specialised care for early psychosis. British Medical Journal 329, 1067.Google Scholar
Crumlish, N, Whitty, P, Clarke, M, Browne, S, Kamali, M, Gervin, M, McTigue, O, Kinsella, A, Waddington, JL, Larkin, C, O'Callaghan, E (2009). Beyond the critical period: longitudinal study of 8-year outcome in first-episode non-affective psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 194, 18–24.Google Scholar
Gafoor, R, Nitsch, D, McCrone, P, Craig, TKJ, Garety, PA, Power, P, McGuire, P (2010). Effect of early intervention on 5-year outcome in non-affective psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 196, 372–376.Google Scholar
Harris, MG, Henry, LP, Harrigan, SM, Purcell, R, Schwartz, OS, Farrelly, SE, Prosser, AL, Jackson, HJ, McGorry, PD (2005). The relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome: an eight-year prospective study. Schizophrenia Research 79, 85–93.Google Scholar
Harrison, G, Hopper, K, Craig, T, Laska, E, Siegel, C, Wanderling, J, Dube, KC, Ganev, K, Giel, R, an der Heiden, W, Holmberg, SK, Janca, A, Lee, PW, Leon, CA, Malhotra, S, Marsella, AJ, Nakane, Y, Sartorius, N, Shen, Y, Skoda, C, Thara, R, Tsirkin, SJ, Varma, VK, Walsh, D, Wiersma, D (2001). Recovery from psychotic illness: a 15- and 25-year international follow-up study. British Journal of Psychiatry 178, 506–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, G, Mason, P (2007). Nottingham, UK. In Recovery from Schizophrenia: An International Perspective (ed. Hopper, K., Harrison, G., Janca, A. and Sartorius, N.), pp. 177–188. Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrow, M, Grossman, LS, Jobe, TH, Herbener, ES (2005). Do patients with schizophrenia ever show periods of recovery? A 15-year multi-follow-up study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 31, 723–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, JD, Baldessarini, RJ, Tohen, M, Waternaux, C, Oepen, G (1994). One hundred years of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of the outcome literature. American Journal of Psychiatry 151, 1409–1416.Google ScholarPubMed
Hegelstad, WT, Larsen, TK, Auestad, B, Evensen, J, Haahr, U, Joa, I, Johannesen, JO, Langeveld, J, Melle, I, Opjordsmoen, S, Rossberg, JI, Rund, BR, Simonsen, E, Sundet, K, Vaglum, P, Friis, S, McGlashan, T (2012). Long-term follow-up of the TIPS early detection in psychosis study: effects on 10-year outcome. American Journal of Psychiatry 169, 374–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, M, Crumlish, N, Clarke, M, Whitty, P, Owens, E, Renwick, L, Browne, S, Macklin, EA, Kinsella, A, Larkin, C, Waddington, JL, O'Callaghan, E (2012). Prospective relationship of duration of untreated psychosis to psychopathology and functional outcome over 12 years. Schizophrenia Research 141, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaaskelainen, E, Miettunen, J, Veijola, J, McGrath, JJ, Murray, GK, Jones, PB, Isohanni, M (2008). Associations between early development and outcome in schizophrenia – a 35-year follow-up of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Schizophrenia Research 99, 29–37.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, J, Fearon, P, Morgan, C, Dazzan, P, Morgan, K, Tarrant, J, Lloyd, T, Holloway, J, Hutchinson, G, Leff, J, Mallett, R, Harrison, G, Murray, R, Jones, P (2006). Heterogeneity in incidence rates of schizophrenia and other psychotic syndromes: findings from the 3-center AESOP study. Archives of General Psychiatry 63, 250–258.Google Scholar
Kurihara, T, Kato, M, Reverger, R, Tirta, IG (2011). Seventeen-year clinical outcome of schizophrenia in Bali. European Psychiatry 26, 333–338.Google Scholar
Larsen, TK, Melle, I, Auestad, B, Friis, S, Haahr, U, Johannessen, JO, Opjordsmoen, S, Rund, BR, Simonsen, E, Vaglum, P, McGlashan, T (2006). Early detection of first-episode psychosis: the effect on 1-year outcome. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32, 758–764.Google Scholar
Larsen, TK, Melle, I, Auestad, B, Haahr, U, Joa, I, Johannessen, JO, Opjordsmoen, S, Rund, BR, Rossberg, JI, Simonsen, E, Vaglum, P, Friis, S, McGlashan, T (2011). Early detection of psychosis: positive effects on 5-year outcome. Psychological Medicine 41, 1461–1469.Google Scholar
Malla, A, Norman, R, Bechard-Evans, L, Schmitz, N, Manchanda, R, Cassidy, C (2008). Factors influencing relapse during a 2-year follow-up of first-episode psychosis in a specialized early intervention service. Psychological Medicine 38, 1585–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menezes, NM, Arenovich, T, Zipursky, RB (2006). A systematic review of longitudinal outcome studies of first-episode psychosis. Psychological Medicine 36, 1349–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modestin, J, Huber, A, Satirli, E, Malti, T, Hell, D (2003). Long-term course of schizophrenic illness: Bleuler's study reconsidered. American Journal of Psychiatry 160, 2202–2208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möller, HJ, Jager, M, Riedel, M, Obermeier, M, Strauss, A, Bottlender, R (2010). The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFUSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: comparison of psychopathological and psychosocial course and outcome and prediction of chronicity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 260, 367–384.Google Scholar
Morgan, C, Dazzan, P, Morgan, K, Jones, P, Harrison, G, Leff, J, Murray, R, Fearon, P (2006). First episode psychosis and ethnicity: initial findings from the AESOP study. World Psychiatry 5, 40–46.Google Scholar
Morgan, C, Kirkbride, J, Hutchinson, G, Craig, T, Morgan, K, Dazzan, P, Boydell, J, Doody, G, Jones, P, Murray, R, Leff, J, Fearon, P (2008). Cumulative social disadvantage, ethnicity and first-episode psychosis: a case-control study. Psychological Medicine 38, 1701–1715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordentoft, M, Ohlenschlaeger, J, Thorup, A, Petersen, L, Jeppesen, P, Bertelsen, M (2010). Deinstitutionalization revisited: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of hospital-based rehabilitation versus specialized assertive intervention (OPUS) versus standard treatment for patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Psychological Medicine 40, 1619–1626.Google Scholar
Norman, RM, Manchanda, R, Windell, D, Harricharan, R, Northcott, S, Hassall, L (2012). The role of treatment delay in predicting 5-year outcomes in an early intervention program. Psychological Medicine 42, 223–233.Google Scholar
Robinson, DG, Woerner, MG, McMeniman, M, Mendelowitz, A, Bilder, RM (2004). Symptomatic and functional recovery from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 161, 473–479.Google Scholar
Saha, S, Chant, D, McGrath, J (2007). A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia: is the differential mortality gap widening over time? Archives of General Psychiatry 64, 1123–1131.Google Scholar
Sartorius, N, Gulbinat, W, Harrison, G, Laska, E, Siegel, C (1996). Long-term follow-up of schizophrenia in 16 countries. A description of the International Study of Schizophrenia conducted by the World Health Organization. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 31, 249–258.Google Scholar
Thara, R, Henrietta, M, Joseph, A, Rajkumar, S, Eaton, WW (1994). Ten-year course of schizophrenia – the Madras longitudinal study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 90, 329–336.Google Scholar
van Os, J, Wright, P, Murray, R (1997). Follow-up studies of schizophrenia I: Natural history and non-psychopathological predictors of outcome. European Psychiatry 12 (Suppl. 5), 327 s–341 s.Google Scholar
White, C, Stirling, J, Hopkins, R, Morris, J, Montague, L, Tantam, D, Lewis, S (2009). Predictors of 10-year outcome of first-episode psychosis. Psychological Medicine 39, 1447–1456.Google Scholar
WHO (1992). Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
Wiersma, D, Nienhuis, FJ, Slooff, CJ, Giel, R (1998). Natural course of schizophrenic disorders: a 15-year followup of a Dutch incidence cohort. Schizophrenia Bulletin 24, 75–85.Google Scholar
Zipursky, RB, Reilly, TJ, Murrat, RM (2013). The myth of schizophrenia as a progressive brain disease. Schizophrenia Bulletin 39, 1363–1372.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Morgan Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Morgan Supplementary Material(File)
File 344.1 KB