Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:02:47.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex reassignment: outcomes and predictors of treatment for adolescent and adult transsexuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2004

YOLANDA L. S. SMITH
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
STEPHANIE H. M. VAN GOOZEN
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ABRAHAM J. KUIPER
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
PEGGY T. COHEN-KETTENIS
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background. We prospectively studied outcomes of sex reassignment, potential differences between subgroups of transsexuals, and predictors of treatment course and outcome.

Method. Altogether 325 consecutive adolescent and adult applicants for sex reassignment participated: 222 started hormone treatment, 103 did not; 188 completed and 34 dropped out of treatment. Only data of the 162 adults were used to evaluate treatment. Results between subgroups were compared to determine post-operative differences. Adults and adolescents were included to study predictors of treatment course and outcome. Results were statistically analysed with logistic regression and multiple linear regression analyses.

Results. After treatment the group was no longer gender dysphoric. The vast majority functioned quite well psychologically, socially and sexually. Two non-homosexual male-to-female transsexuals expressed regrets. Post-operatively, female-to-male and homosexual transsexuals functioned better in many respects than male-to-female and non-homosexual transsexuals. Eligibility for treatment was largely based upon gender dysphoria, psychological stability, and physical appearance. Male-to-female transsexuals with more psychopathology and cross-gender symptoms in childhood, yet less gender dysphoria at application, were more likely to drop out prematurely. Non-homosexual applicants with much psychopathology and body dissatisfaction reported the worst post-operative outcomes.

Conclusions. The results substantiate previous conclusions that sex reassignment is effective. Still, clinicians need to be alert for non-homosexual male-to-females with unfavourable psychological functioning and physical appearance and inconsistent gender dysphoria reports, as these are risk factors for dropping out and poor post-operative results. If they are considered eligible, they may require additional therapeutic guidance during or even after treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: PDF

Smith supplementary material

Smith Appendix

Download Smith supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 41.4 KB