Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:59:00.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Speech dominance, handedness and electro-convulsions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Micheal D. Kopelman*
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Michael D. Kopelman, The Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ.

Synopsis

This paper discusses methods for assessing speech dominance in cases for unilateral ECT. The use of formal laterality tests has been strongly advocated in the literature, but is seldom adopted in clinical practice. Assessment of handwriting type (left/right, inverted/non-inverted) has been put forward as an alternative, but is not valid. Consideration of handedness alone is the most common practice, but is of little value. From current evidence on the relation of handedness to speech dominance, the paper evaluates the likely outcomes of always administering right-sided ECT, and of giving formal tests to left-handers only.

Type
Brief Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. S. (1980). Letter: Language lateralisation and unilateral ECT. British Journal of Psychiatry 136, 316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand-preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology 61, 303321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annett, M. (1975). Hand preference and the laterality of cerebral speech. Cortex 11, 305328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaton, A. A. (1981). Letter: Left hand, right hand. British Medical Journal i, 992993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, J. G. & McCarthy, R. (1981). Dichotic ear asymmetry and writing posture. Neuropsychologia 19, 469472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clyma, E. A. (1975). Unilateral ECT: how to determine which hemisphere is dominant. British Journal of Psychiatry 126, 372379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbourn, C. J. (1978). Can laterality be measured? Neuropsychologia 16, 283289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Elia, G. (1970). Unilateral ECT. Acta psychiatrica scandinavica Supplement 215.Google Scholar
Dornbush, R., Abrams, R. & Fink, M. (1971). Memory changes after unilateral and bilateral ECT. British Journal of Psychiatry 119, 7578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleminger, J. J. & Bunce, L. (1975). Investigation of cerebral dominance in ‘left-handers’ and ‘right-handers’ using unilateral ECT. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 38, 541545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleminger, J. J., Horne, D. J. de L. & Nott, P. N. (1970). Unilateral ECT and cerebral dominance: effect of right- and left-sided electrode placement on verbal memory. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 33, 408411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. P. L. (1979). Electroconvulsive therapy: its current clinical use. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 21, 281292.Google Scholar
Geffen, G., Traub, E. & Stierman, I. (1978) Language laterality assessed by unilateral ECT and dichotic monitoring. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 41, 354360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, A. M., Davison, K., Browne, M. W. & Kreeger, L. C. (1968). A comparison of the effects on depression and memory of bilateral ECT and unilateral ECT to the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres. British Journal of Psychiatry 114, 9971012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, E. C., Deakin, J. F. W., Lawler, P., Frith, C. D., Stevens, M., McPherson, K. & Crow, T. J. (1980). The Northwick Park ECT Trial. Lancet ii, 13171320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, E. C., Crow, T. J., Deakin, J. F. W., Frith, C. D., McPherson, K., Lawler, P. G. & Stevens, M. (1981). Letter: The Northwick Park ECT Trial. Lancet i, 842843.Google Scholar
Kopelman, M. D. (1981). Psychological aspects of neurology. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 26, 367379.Google ScholarPubMed
Levy, J. & Reid, M. (1976). Variations in writing posture and cerebral organisation. Science 194, 337339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lishman, W. A. & McMeekan, E. R. L. (1976). Hand preference patterns in psychiatric patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 129, 158166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeever, W. F. & VanDeventer, A. D. Deventer, A. D. (1980). Inverted handwriting position, language laterality, and the Levy–Nagylaki model of handedness and cerebral organisation. Neuropsychologia 18, 99102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, B. (1974). Hemispheric specialisation: scope and limits. In The Neurosciences: Third Study Program (ed. Schmitt, F. and Worden, F.), pp. 7589. M.I.T. Press: Boston.Google Scholar
Milner, B. (1975). Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management. In Advances in Neurology Vol. 8 (ed. Purpura, D., Penry, J., Walter, R.), pp. 299321. Raven Press: New York.Google Scholar
Pippard, J. & Ellam, L. (1981). Electroconvulsive Treatment in Great Britain, 1980: a Report to the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Gaskell: London.Google Scholar
Pratt, R. T. C. & Warrington, E. K. (1972). The assessment of cerebral dominance with unilateral ECT. British Journal of Psychiatry 121, 327328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satz, P. (1977). Laterality tests: an inferential problem. Cortex 13, 208212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, L. R. (1977). ECT and memory loss. American Journal of Psychiatry 134, 9971001.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, S. F. (1980). Lateralisation of functions in the vertebrate brain: a review. British Journal of Psychiatry 71, 329367.Google ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K. & Pratt, R. T. C. (1973). Language laterality in left-handers assessed by unilateral ECT. Neuropsychologia 11, 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E. K. & Pratt, R. T. C. (1981). The significance of laterality effects. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 44, 193196.Google ScholarPubMed
West, E. D. (1981). ECT in depression: a double-blind controlled trial. British Medical Journal i, 355357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar