Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:26:16.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time trends in coroners' use of different verdicts for possible suicides and their impact on officially reported incidence of suicide in England: 1990–2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2012

D. Gunnell ,
O. Bennewith ,
S. Simkin ,
J. Cooper ,
E. Klineberg ,
C. Rodway ,
L. Sutton ,
S. Steeg ,
C. Wells  and
K. Hawton
...Show all authors
D. Gunnell*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
O. Bennewith
Affiliation:
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
S. Simkin
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
J. Cooper
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, UK
E. Klineberg
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Adolescent Medicine, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
C. Rodway
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, UK
L. Sutton
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
S. Steeg
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, UK
C. Wells
Affiliation:
Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
K. Hawton
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
N. Kapur
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: D. Gunnell, Professor of Epidemiology, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK. (Email: D.J.Gunnell@bristol.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Official suicide statistics for England are based on deaths given suicide verdicts and most cases given an open verdict following a coroner's inquest. Previous research indicates that some deaths given accidental verdicts are considered to be suicides by clinicians. Changes in coroners' use of different verdicts may bias suicide trend estimates. We investigated whether suicide trends may be over- or underestimated when they are based on deaths given suicide and open verdicts.

Method

Possible suicides assessed by 12 English coroners in 1990/91, 1998 and 2005 and assigned open, accident/misadventure or narrative verdicts were rated by three experienced suicide researchers according to the likelihood that they were suicides. Details of all suicide verdicts given by these coroners were also recorded.

Results

In 1990/91, 72.0% of researcher-defined suicides received a suicide verdict from the coroner, this decreased to 65.4% in 2005 (ptrend < 0.01); equivalent figures for combined suicide and open verdicts were 95.4% (1990/91) and 86.7% (2005). Researcher-defined suicides with a verdict of accident/misadventure doubled over that period, from 4.6% to 9.1% (p < 0.01). Narrative verdict cases rose from zero in 1990/91 to 25 in 2005 (4.2% of researcher-defined suicides that year). In 1998 and 2005, 50.0% of the medicine poisoning deaths given accidental/misadventure verdicts were rated as suicide by the researchers.

Conclusions

Between 1990/91 and 2005, the proportion of researcher-defined suicides given a suicide verdict by coroners decreased, largely due to an increased use of accident/misadventure verdicts, particularly for deaths involving poisoning. Consideration should be given to the inclusion of ‘accidental’ deaths by poisoning with medicines in the statistics available for monitoring suicides rates.

Keywords

Cause of deathclassification methodssuicidesuicide statisticstime trends
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 43 , Issue 7 , July 2013 , pp. 1415 - 1422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennewith, O, Gunnell, D, Nowers, M (2007). Effect of barriers on the Clifton suspension bridge, England, on local patterns of suicide: implications for prevention. British Journal of Psychiatry 190, 266–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, A, Griffiths, C (2003). Trends in suicide by method in England and Wales, 1979 to 2001. Health Statistics Quarterly 20, 7–18.Google Scholar
Carroll, R, Hawton, K, Kapur, N, Bennewith, O, Gunnell, D (2012). Impact of the growing use of narrative verdicts by coroners on geographic variations in suicide: analysis of coroners' inquest data. Journal of Public Health 34, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, L, Hill, C (2011). Narrative verdicts and their impact on mortality statistics in England and Wales. Health Statistics Quarterly 49, 81–100.Google Scholar
Cooper, PN, Milroy, CM (1995). The Coroners' system and under-reporting of suicide. Medicine, Science and the Law 35, 4319–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Leo, D, Dudley, MJ, Aebersold, CJ, Mendoza, JA, Barnes, MA, Harrison, JE, Ranson, DL (2010). Achieving standardised reporting of suicide in Australia: rationale and program for change. Medical Journal of Australia 192, 452–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M, Read, S, Andrews, H, Wakefield, P, Zafar, R, Kavi, S (2001). Suicide in a single health district: epidemiology and audit of the involvement of psychiatric services. Journal of Mental Health 6, 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (1992). The Health of the Nation. The Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2002). National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England. Department of Health: London.Google Scholar
Dorries, C (2004). Coroners' Courts: A Guide to Law and Practice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Gosney, H, Hawton, K (2007). Inquest verdicts: youth suicides lost. Psychiatric Bulletin 31, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, D, Hawton, Kapur N (2011). Coroners' verdicts and suicide statistics in England and Wales. British Medical Journal 343, d6030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holding, TA, Barraclough, BM (1978). Undetermined deaths – suicide or accident? British Journal of Psychiatry 133, 542–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linsley, KR, Schapira, K, Kelly, TP (2001). Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research. British Journal of Psychiatry 178, 465–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neeleman, J, Wessely, S (1997). Changes in classification of suicide in England and Wales: time trends and associations with coroners' professional backgrounds. Psychological Medicine 27, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Donnell, I, Farmer, R (1995). The limitations of official suicide statistics. British Journal of Psychiatry 166, 458–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, A, Taylor, R, Martin, G (2010). Recent declines in Australian male suicide are real, not artefactual. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 44, 358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, S, Backett, S, Kreitman, N (1988). Social construction or causal ascription: distinguishing suicide from undetermined deaths. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 23, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pounder, DJ (1992). Classifying suicide. British Medical Journal 305, 472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
StataCorp (2009). Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. StataCorp LP: College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Thomas, K, Gunnell, D (2010). Suicide in England and Wales 1861–2007: a time-trends analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology 39, 1464–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed