Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-wdhn8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T12:00:43.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Additional Variables on Factor Indeterminacy in Models with a Single Common Factor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Stanley A. Mulaik  and
Roderick P. McDonald
Stanley A. Mulaik*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Roderick P. McDonald
Affiliation:
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Dr. Stanley A. Muliak, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Determinate” solutions for the indeterminate common factor of p variables satisfying the single common factor model are not unique. Therefore an infinite sequence of additional variables that conform jointly with the original p variables to the original single common factor model does not determine a unique solution for the indeterminate factor of the p variables (although the solution is unique for the factor of the infinite sequence). Other infinite sequences may be found to determine different solutions for the factor of the original p variables. The paper discusses a number of theorems about the effects of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in a model with a single common factor and draws conclusions from them for factor theory in general.

Keywords

factor scoresinterpretations of factorsdomain of variables
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 177 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cattell, R. B. Factor analysis, 1952, New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. Factor analysis, 1974, Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Green, B. F. On the factor score controversy. Psychometrika, 1976, 41, 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. Multiple rectilinear prediction and the resolution into components. Psychometrika, 1940, 5, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The determinacy of factor score matrices, with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955, 8, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 1956–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. Simple proofs of relations between the communality problem and multiple correlation. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, H. B. On finite sequences of real numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series A), 1931, 134, 486–501.Google Scholar
Kestelman, H. The fundamental equation of factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1952, 5, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, W. Shortened method of estimation of mental factors by regression. Nature, 1938, 141, 650–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. The measurement of factor indeterminacy. Psychometrika, 1974, 30, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. Descriptive axioms for common factor theory, image theory, and component theory. Psychometrika, 1975, 40, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. & Burr, E. J. A comparison of four methods of constructing factor scores. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. The foundations of factor analysis, 1972, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. Confirmatory factor analysis. In Amick, D. J. & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.), Introductory multivariate statistics: Applications in psychology, education, and the social sciences, 1975, Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. Comments on “The measurement of factorial indeterminacy”. Psychometrika, 1976, 41, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaggio, H. T. The general factor in Spearman's theory of intelligence. Nature, 1931, 127, 56–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaggio, H. T. Three sets of conditions necessary for the existence of a g that is real and unique except in sign. British Journal of Psychology, 1933, 24, 88–105.Google Scholar
Rummel, R. J. Applied factor analysis, 1970, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. The minimum average correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors. Psychometrika, 1971, 36, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. Erratum. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 149–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. & Wang, M. M. Some new results on factor indeterminacy. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. Correlation between arrays in a table of correlations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series A), 1922, 101, 94–100.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. The uniqueness of “g”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1929, 20, 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. The uniqueness and exactness of g. British Journal of Psychology, 1933, 24, 106–108.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. The factor theory and its troubles. IV. Uniqueness of g. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934, 25, 142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. H. On measuring g and s by tests which break the g-hierarchy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934, 25, 204–210.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. The definition and measurement of g (general intelligence). Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935, 26, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, 1947, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. B. On hierarchical correlation systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1928, 14, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. B. Review of “The abilities of man, their nature and measurement” by C. Spearman. Science, 1928, 67, 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. B. Comments on Professor Spearman's note. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1929, 20, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar