Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T02:06:47.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model for Serial Verbal Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Ulara Kuno
Ulara Kuno*
Affiliation:
Keio University, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model for analyzing the learning process with a special emphasis on serial-position effect is proposed. This model consists of two analyses, one being an analysis of the learning process of each item in a list by a stochastic method, and the other being an analysis of serial-position effect in terms of pro- and retroactive inhibitions, and of forgetting. The model is experimentally verified, and moreover, it is found that the model permits prediction of the results of many experiments with lists of various lengths and varying difficulty.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1965 , pp. 323 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to acknowledge help received during discussion with Prof. T. Indow.

References

Atkinson, R. C. A stochastic model for rote serial learning. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigham, J. and Munsterberg, H. Memory. Psychol. Rev., 1894, 1, 453–461.Google Scholar
Bugelski, B. R. A remote association explanation of the relative difficulty of learning nonsense syllables in a list. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, R. B. and Mosteller, F.. Stochastic models for learning, New York: Wiley, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, M. W. Association: An essay analytic and experimental. Psychol. Monogr., 1896, 1, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. Memory. (Tr. by H. A. Ruger and C. E. Bussenius.) New York: 1913. Pp. 90–123.Google Scholar
Finkenbinder, E. O. The curve of forgetting. Am. J. Psychol., 1913, 24, 8–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. Les inhibitions internes de fixation. L'Anée Psychologique, 1928, 29, 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C. I. Experimental studies in rote learning theory. I–VIII. J. exp. Psychol., 1938–1949.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. et al. Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. The advanced theory of statistics (3rd ed.),. London: Charles Griffin, 1955, 21–21.Google Scholar
Lepley, W. M. A theory of serial learning and forgetting based upon conditioned reflex principles. J. gen. Psychol., 1932, 29, 279–288.Google Scholar
Lepley, W. M. Serial reactions considered as conditioned reactions. Psychol. Monogr., 1934, 205, 1–54.Google Scholar
Malmo, R. B. and Amsel, A. Anxiety-produced interference in serial rote learning with observations on rote learning after partial frontal lobectomy. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 440–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrary, J. W. and Hunter, W. S. Serial position curves in verbal learning. Science, 1953, 117, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. and McGill, S. J. A statistical description of verbal learning. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, H. et al. Nonparametric tests of significance, Tokyo: Asakura-Shoten (In Japanese), 1957.Google Scholar
Ono, S. A mathematical analysis of serial verbal learning. Japanese Psychol. Res., 1958, 6, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E. S. and Brown, M. A. Effect of serial position upon memorization. Am. J. Psychol., 1926, 37, 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffel, G. Two determinants of the effect of primacy. Am. J. Psychol., 1936, 48, 654–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, M. S. An application of information theory to the problem of the relationship between meaningfulness of material and performance in a learning situation. Res. Bull., 1952, 52–54.Google Scholar
Shipley, W. C. The effect of a short rest pause on retention in rote series of different lengths. J. gen. Psychol., 1939, 21, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. G. The place of repetition in memory. Psychol. Rev., 1896, 3, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, L. B. Reminiscence and rote learning. Psychol. Monogr., 1937, 220, 49–49.Google Scholar
Warden, C. J. Primacy and recency as factors in cul-de-sac elimination in a stylus maze. J. exp. Psychol., 1924, 7, 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar