Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:10:45.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Algebra of Factorial Indeterminancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Emil F. Heermann
Emil F. Heermann*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Certain properties and consequences of factor indeterminancy are deduced from an orthogonal transformation derived by Ledermann. The first deduction is the matrix of cosines between maximally distinct factor axes which represent the same factor solution. This result is used to investigate the indeterminancy of factor extensions.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 539 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dwyer, P. S. The determination of factor loadings of a given test from the known factor loadings of other tests. Psychometrika, 1937, 11, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The determinancy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common factor theory. Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1955, 8, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heermann, E. F. The geometry of factorial indeterminancy. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestelman, H. The fundamental equation of factor analysis. Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1952, 5, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, W. The orthogonal transformation of a factorial matrix into itself. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, W. On a shortened method of estimation of mental factors by regression. Psychometrika, 1939, 4, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. H. The definition and measurement ofg. J. educ. Psychol., 1935, 26, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar