Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-96s6r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:54:22.307Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Amounts of Fixation and Discovery in Maze Learning Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Herbert A. Simon*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institute of Technology

Abstract

The proposed quantitative description of maze learning rests on the assumption that two independent processes are involved: (i) a discovery process based on trial-and-error search for the correct response, (ii) a fixation process equivalent to that observed in serial learning. The model leads to predictions that are consistent with the available experimental data. In particular, the number of trials required for fixation is independent of the number of alternatives at each choice point (and hence independent of the number of bits of information contained in each correct response).

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to W. J. Brogden, G. A. Miller, R. F. Thompson, and J. Voss for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

Brogden, W. J. and Schmidt, R. E. The effect of number of choices per unit of a verbal maze on learning and serial position errors. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 235240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brogden, W. J. and Schmidt, R. E. Acquisition of a 24-unit verbal maze as a function of number of alternative choices per unit. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 335338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovland, C. I. Human learning and retention. In Stevens, S. S. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 613689). New York: Wiley, 1951Google Scholar
Melton, A. W. Learning. In Monroe, W. S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 668690). New York: Macmillan, 1950Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychol. Rev., 1956, 63, 8197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. Human memory and the storage of information. IRE Trans. on Information Theory, 1956, IT-2, 129137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, T. C., and Henninger, L. C. The relation between length and difficulty in motor learning; a comparison with verbal learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 657678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. F. A comparison of correction and non-correction procedures on the acquisition of a 12-unit verbal maze. (Unpublished report).Google Scholar