Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-rgzdr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:27:48.770Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Unreplicated Three-Way Classifications, with Applications to Rater Bias and Trait Independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Julian C. Stanley*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin

Abstract

The seven analysis-of-variance mean squares for an unreplicated three-way classification may be written as linear combinations of a mean variance and three mean covariances. Formulas are presented for computing the mean variances and mean covariances from linear combinations of mean squares. The relevance of these formulas for assessing rater biases and trait independence is discussed, a numerical example is provided, and proposed extensions are briefly noted.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with the United States Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The assistance of Sister M. Jacinta Mann, S. C., at one stage of this investigation is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abelson, R. P. A discriminant approach to factoring three-way data tables. Amer. Psychologist, 1958, 13, 375375. (Abstract)Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull., 1959, 56, 81105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, P.-L. Statistical analysis of personality rating. J. exp. Educ., 1937, 5, 229245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornfield, J. and Tukey, J. W. Average values of mean squares in factorials. Ann. math. Statist., 1956, 27, 907949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Amer. Psychologist, 1957, 12, 671684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, D. A. Analysis-of-variance tests in the analysis and comparison of curves. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 141154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, H. Theory of mental tests, New York: Wiley, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, C. J. Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance. Psychometrika, 1941, 6, 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, C. J. and Stunkard, C. L. Estimation of test reliability for unrestricted item scoring methods. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1951, 12, 756758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L. G. Note on the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull., 1960, 57, 8688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. M. and Vidulich, R. N. Experimental manipulation of the halo effect. J. appl. Psychol., 1956, 40, 130134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. C. Fixed, random, and mixed models in the analysis of variance as special cases of a finite model. Psychol. Rep., 1956, 2, 369369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. C. K-R 20 as the stepped-up mean item intercorrelation. 14th Yrbk Natl Coun. Meas. used in Educ., 1957. Pp. 7892..Google Scholar
Wilk, M. B. and Kempthorne, O. Fixed, mixed, and random models. J. Amer. statist. Ass., 1955, 50, 11441167.Google Scholar
Wilk, M. B. and Kempthorne, O. Derived linear models and their use in the analysis of randomized experiments. WADC Tech. Rep., 1956, II, 55244.Google Scholar
Wilk, M. B. and Kempthorne, O. Some aspects of the analysis of factorial experiments in a completely randomized design. Ann. math. Statist., 1956, 27, 950985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham, W. W. and Jones, M. B. On the identification of halo through analysis of variance. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 403407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar