Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T02:03:09.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Unshifted Distributional Models Appropriate for Response Time?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
*
Request for reprints should be sent to Jeffrey N. Rouder, 210 McAlester Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. E-mail: jeff@banta.psyc.missouri.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 377 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research is supported by NSF grants SES - 0095919 and 0351523 to J. Rouder, D. Sun, and P. Speckman. Further support came from University of Missouri Research Council, Ministry of Education of Spain, and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. I thank Francis Tuerlinckx for helpful discussions.

References

Balota, D.A., & Spieler, D.H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glickman, M.E., Gray, J.R., & Morales, C.J. (in press). Combining speed and accuracy to assess error-free cognitive processes. Psychometrika.Google Scholar
Hockley, W.E. (1984). Analysis of reaction time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 598–615.Google Scholar
Hohle, R.H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, G.D. (1992). Shapes of reaction time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 883–914.Google ScholarPubMed
Luce, R.D. (1986). Response Times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelder, J.A., & Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7, 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peruggia, M., Van Zandt, T., & Chen, M. (2002). Was it a car or a cat I saw? An analysis of response times for word recognition. Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, 7, 308–313.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J.N. (1998). Modeling response times for decisions between two choices. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J.N. (2000). A diffusion model analysis of letter masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 26, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2001). The effect of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and Aging, 16, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, T.R.C., & Cressie, N.A.C. (1988). Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouder, J.N., Lu, J., Speckman, P.L., Sun, D., & Jiang, Y. (in press). A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.Google Scholar
Rouder, J.N., Sun, D., Speckman, P.L., Lu, J., & Zhou, D. (2003). A hierarchical Bayesian statistical framework for response time distributions. Psychometrika, 68, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnipke, D.L., & Scrams, D.J. (1997). Modeling item response times with a two-state mixture model: A new method of measuring speededness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, M.J., & Gibson, B.S. (2004). Assing hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708–719.Google Scholar
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2005) Psychometric modeling of response time and accuracy with mixed and conditional regression. Psychometrika 70, DOI: 10.1007/s11336-003-1078-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar