Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:44:00.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asymptotic Identifiability of Nonparametric Item Response Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jeffrey A. Douglas*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Illinois
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Jeffrey A. Douglas, 101 Illini Hall, 725 South Wright Street, Champaign, IL. E-Mail: jeffdoug@stat.uiuc.edu

Abstract

The identifiability of item response models with nonparametrically specified item characteristic curves is considered. Strict identifiability is achieved, with a fixed latent trait distribution, when only a single set of item characteristic curves can possibly generate the manifest distribution of the item responses. When item characteristic curves belong to a very general class, this property cannot be achieved. However, for assessments with many items, it is shown that all models for the manifest distribution have item characteristic curves that are very near one another and pointwise differences between them converge to zero at all values of the latent trait as the number of items increases. An upper bound for the rate at which this convergence takes place is given. The main result provides theoretical support to the practice of nonparametric item response modeling, by showing that models for long assessments have the property of asymptotic identifiability.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research was partially supported by the National Institute of Health grant R01 CA81068-01.

References

de Leeuw, J., & Verhelst, N. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 11, 183196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J. (1997). Joint consistency of nonparametric item characteristic curve and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 62, 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junker, B., & Ellis, J. (1997). A characterization of monotone unidimensional latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 25, 13271343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeffding, W. (1963). Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 19, 293325.Google Scholar
Mikhailov, V.G. (1995). On a refinement of the central limit theorem for sums of independent random indicators. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 38, 479489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokken, R., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J.O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56, 611630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J.O., & Abrahamowicz, M. (1989). Binomial regression with monotone splines: A psychometric application. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 906915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1979). A new family of models for the multiple-choice item. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1981). Efficient methods of estimating the operating characteristic of item response categories and challenge to a new model for the multiple-choice item. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1984). Plausibility functions of the Iowa Vocabulary Test items estimated by the simple sum procedure of the conditional P.D.F. approach. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. (1988). Advancement of latent trait theory. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. (1990). Differential weight procedure of the conditional p.d.f. approach for estimating the operating characteristic of discrete item responses. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijtsma, K. (1998). Methodology review: Nonparametric IRT approaches to the analysis of dichotomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. (1987). Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory. Psychometrika, 52, 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, W. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar