Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T02:27:43.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classical and Bayesian Inference in Certain Latency Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gordon G. Bechtel
Gordon G. Bechtel*
Affiliation:
Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Certain aspects of point estimation are treated for two kinds of exponential latency processes. The first unitary process is represented by a simple exponential density in which the rate parameter may be viewed as an unknown constant or as a random variable. If a second, slower exponential process is grafted onto the first, there results a postulated two-component latency between stimulus and response. Moments estimators are derived for the two parameters of this latter density, and the relevance of the second parameter to decision time is emphasized.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 491 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant MH-04439-05. The author would like to express his appreciation to James Baker of Oregon Research Institute for certain helpful comments concerning aspects of this work.

References

Brunk, H. D. An introduction to mathematical statistics, New York: Ginn, 1960.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. A theory of data, New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
Edwards, W., Lindman, H., andSavage, L. J. Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychol. Rev., 1963, 70, 193–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. Tests for the validity of the assumption that the underlying distribution of life is exponential: Part I. Technometrics, 1960, 2, 83–101.Google Scholar
Epstein, B. Tests for the validity of the assumption that the underlying distribution of life is exponential: Part II. Technometrics, 1960, 2, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. Statistical life test acceptance procedures. Technometrics, 1960, 2, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. Estimation from life test data. Technometrics, 1960, 2, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods and scientific inference (2nd ed., rev.), London: Oliver and Boyd, 1959.Google Scholar
Greenwood, A. J. and Durand, D. Aids for fitting the gamma distribution by maximum likelihood. Technometrics, 1960, 2, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. Response latencies and probabilities. In Arrow, K. J., Karlin, S., andSuppes, P. (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences, 1959. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1960, 298–311..Google Scholar
McGill, W. J. Stochastic latency mechanisms. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., andGalanter, E. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1963, 309–360..Google Scholar
McGill, W. J. and Gibbon, J. The general-gamma distribution and reaction times. J. of math. Psychol., 1965, 2, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mood, A. M. and Graybill, F. A. Introduction to the theory of statistics (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. Applied statistical decision theory, Boston: Harvard Univ. Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research, 1961.Google Scholar