Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:52:04.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Estimation of the Discriminal Dispersion in the Method of Successive Intervals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Raymond H. Burros
Raymond H. Burros*
Affiliation:
Institute for Motivational Research, Inc., Croton-on-Hudson, N. Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new algebraic formula is derived for estimation of the discriminal dispersion in the method of successive intervals. The legitimate use of the formula requires that as many normal deviates as possible be present in the matrix. For this reason, it is recommended that deviates corresponding to the interval (0.01, 0.99) of the cumulative proportions be used, instead of those corresponding to (0.05, 0.95), the interval used by Edwards and Thurstone. Computations on data published by Edwards and Thurstone showed that when adjustment was made for variability in dispersions calculated by the formula of this paper, a reduction of fifty per cent in mean absolute discrepancy was produced. Since the formula is easy to use and avoids the disadvantages of its predecessors, it should have fairly wide applicability in psychological research.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1955 , pp. 299 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © 1955 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by the United States Air Force under Contract No. AF 33(038)-25726 monitored by Air Force Personnel and Training Research Center. Permission is granted for reproduction, translation, publication, use and disposal in whole and in part by or for the United States Government. The writer is grateful to Dr. A. L. Edwards for a critical reading of an earlier version of this paper, and to Dr. L. H. Lanier and Dr. L. M. Stolurow for editorial advice on the present version, which was written at the University of Illinois. The editors of Psychometrika have informed the writer that H. J. A. Rimoldi and M. Hormaeche (7) have independently derived the same formula for the discriminal dispersion from a different set of postulates using the law of comparative judgment.

References

Attneave, F.. A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 334–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burros, R. H.. The application of the method of paired comparisons to the study of reaction potential. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burros, R. H., Gibson, W. A.. A solution for Case III of the law of comparative judgment. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L.. The scaling of stimuli by the method of successive intervals. J. appl. Psychol., 1952, 36, 118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L., Thurstone, L. L.. An internal consistency check for scale values determined by the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, H.. A least squares solution for successive intervals. American Psychologist, 1952, 7, 408–408Google Scholar
Rimoldi, H. J. A., Hormaeche, M.. The law of comparative judgment in the successive intervals and graphic rating scale methods. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffir, M. A.. A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. Stimulus dispersions in the method of constant stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1932, 15, 284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar