Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
FRIJTERS, J. E. R.
1982.
Expanded Tables for Conversion of a Proportion of Correct Responses (Pc to the Measure of Sensory Difference (d′) for the Triangular Method and the 3‐Alternative Forced Choice Procedure.
Journal of Food Science,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
FRANCOIS, PIERRE.
and
SAUVAGEOT, FRANCOIS.
1988.
COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF PAIR, DUO‐TRIO AND TRIANGLE TESTS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
p.
81.
VIÉ, ANNE.
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL.
1989.
TRIANGULAR DIFFERENCE TESTING: REFINEMENTS TO SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR PREDICTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL TRIADS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
87.
THIEME, URSULA.
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL.
1990.
MODIFICATIONS TO SENSORY DIFFERENCE TEST PROTOCOLS: THE WARMED UP PAIRED COMPARISON, THE SINGLE STANDARD DUO‐TRIO AND THE A‐NOT A TEST MODIFIED FOR RESPONSE BIAS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
159.
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL
MASUOKA, SUSUMU
and
ISHII, RIE
1994.
A THEORETICAL NOTE ON DIFFERENCE TESTS: MODELS, PARADOXES AND COGNITIVE STRATEGIES.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
247.
BI, JIAN
1995.
NONPARAMETRIC MODELS FOR DISCRIMINATION METHODS AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR TRIADS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
325.
MASUOKA, SUSUMU
HATJOPOULOS, DIMITRIOS
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL
1995.
BEER BITTERNESS DETECTION: TESTING THURSTONIAN AND SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS MODELS FOR TRIAD AND TETRAD METHODS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
295.
ROUSSEAU, BENOÎT
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL
1997.
SENSORY DIFFERENCE TESTS: THURSTONIAN AND SSA PREDICTIONS FOR VANILLA FLAVORED YOGURTS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
127.
Dessirier, Jean-Marc
and
O’Mahony, Michael
1998.
Comparison of d′ values for the 2-AFC (paired comparison) and 3-AFC discrimination methods: Thurstonian models, sequential sensitivity analysis and power.
Food Quality and Preference,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
ROUSSEAU, BENOÎT
MEYER, ALEXANDRA
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL
1998.
POWER AND SENSITIVITY OF THE SAME‐DIFFERENT TEST: COMPARISON WITH TRIANGLE AND DUO‐TRIO METHODS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
149.
Rousseau, Benoı̂t
Rogeaux, Michel
and
O'Mahony, Michael
1999.
Mustard discrimination by same–different and triangle tests: aspects of irritation, memory and τ criteria.
Food Quality and Preference,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
173.
2005.
Sensory Discrimination Tests and Measurements.
p.
21.
KIM, HEE‐JIN
JEON, SEON YOUNG
KIM, KWANG‐OK
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL
2006.
THURSTONIAN MODELS AND VARIANCE I: EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENCE TESTS AND EFFECTS OF PERCEPTUAL VARIANCE.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 5,
p.
465.
KIM, HEE‐JIN
KIM, KWANG‐OK
JEON, SEON YOUNG
KIM, JUNG‐MI
and
O'MAHONY, MICHAEL
2006.
THURSTONIAN MODELS AND VARIANCE II: EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION OF THE EFFECTS OF VARIANCE ON THURSTONIAN MODELS OF SCALING.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 5,
p.
485.
Lee, H.-S.
and
O’Mahony, M.
2007.
The evolution of a model: A review of Thurstonian and conditional stimulus effects on difference testing.
Food Quality and Preference,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
369.
O'MAHONY, M.
and
HAUTUS, M.J.
2008.
THE SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY ROC CURVE: SOME APPLICATIONS IN FOOD SENSORY SCIENCE.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 2,
p.
186.
Wichchukit, Sukanya
and
O’Mahony, Michael
2010.
A Transfer of Technology from Engineering: Use of ROC Curves from Signal Detection Theory to Investigate Information Processing in the Brain during Sensory Difference Testing.
Journal of Food Science,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 9,
2015.
Sensory Discrimination Tests and Measurements.
p.
489.