Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:31:08.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors in the Learning Behavior of the Albino Rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Neil J. F. Van Steenberg
Neil J. F. Van Steenberg*
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The table of intercorrelations published by Dr. R. L. Thorndike in the Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1935, 17, No. 1, has been reanalyzed into ten factors. Rotation of the reference vectors resulted in a configuration which, for all practical purposes, may be said to show a simple structure and (except for one variable on one factor) a positive manifold. Five of the factors can be interpreted with some confidence, one only with considerable caution; three factors are specific to the apparatus employed, and for the one remaining factor, no interpretation is attempted; it appears to be a residual plane.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1939 , pp. 179 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © 1939 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alm, O. W. The effect of habit interference upon performance in maze learning. Genet Psychol. Monogr., 1931, 10, 379–526.Google Scholar
Commins, W. D., McNemar, Quin, and Stone, C. P. Intercorrelations of measures of ability in the rat. J. comp. Psychol., 1932, 14, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Frank C., and Tolman, Edward C. A note on the correlation between two mazes. J. comp. Psychol., 1924, 4, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Vinnie C. The relative values of the different curves of learning. J. Animal Behavior, 1911, 1, 138–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honzik, C. H. The sensory basis of maze learning in rats. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1936, 13, 1–113.Google Scholar
Honzik, C. H. and Tolman, E. C. The perception of spatial relations by the rat. J. comp. Psychol., 1936, 22, 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, H. B. Time versus distance in learning. J. Animal Behavior, 1914, 4, 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, W. S. The sensory control of the maze habit in the white rat. J. gen. Psychol., 1929, 36, 505–537.Google Scholar
Husband, R. W. A note on maze learning with the time factor constant. J. gen. Psychol., 1929, 2, 366–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, T. A. General factors in transfer of training in the white rat. Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 1932, 2, 3–59.Google Scholar
Krechevsky, I. “Hypothesis” versus “chance” in the presolution period in sensory discrimination-learning. Univ. Calif. Pub. Psychol., 1932, 6, 27–44.Google Scholar
Krechevsky, I. The genesis of “hypothesis” in rats. Univ. Calif. Pub. Psychol., 1932, 6, 45–64.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. Nervous mechanisms in learning. In Murchison, (Eds.), The Foundations of Experimental Psychology. Worcester, Mass.: Clark Univ. Press. 1929, 525–525.Google Scholar
Leeper, Rober. The reliability and validity of maze experiments with white rats. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1932, 11, 137–245.Google Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. The effect of cerebral destruction on reasoning and learning in rats. J. comp. Neurol., 1932, 54, 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. Cortical destruction on the posterior part of the brain and its effect on reasoning in rats. J. comp. Neurol., 1932, 56, 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Walter R. The comparative learning of rats on elevated and alley mazes of the same pattern. J. comp. Psychol., 1930, 10, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundquist, E. A. Inheritance of spontaneous activity in rats. J. comp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoddy, George S.The time factor in learning. Bull. School Education, Indiana Univ., 12, No. 4, Twenty-third Annual Conference of Educational Measurements, 30–44.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. Organization of behavior in the albino rat. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1935, 17, 1–70.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.Primary mental abilities.Psychometric Monogr., 1937, No. 1, 1–121.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A new rotational method in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1939, 3, 199–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, Miles A. The significance of speed in test response. Psychol. Rev., 1931, 38, 450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. Nyswander, D. B. The reliability and validity of maze measures of rats. J. comp. Psychol., 1927, 7, 425–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomilin, Michael I. andStone, C. P. Intercorrelations of measures of learning ability in the albino rat. J. comp. Psychol., 1934, 17, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryon, C. M. On the nature of “speed” and its relation to other variables. J. gen. Psychol., 1933, 8, 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryon, C. M. and Jones, H. E. The relationship between “speed” and “altitude.”. J. exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Yu-Chua. The function of the visual areas of the rat in the learning and retention of the maze — I. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1934, 10, 1–56.Google Scholar
Tsang, Yu-Chua. The function of the visual areas of the rat in the learning and retention of the maze — II. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1936, 12, 1–41.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Charles L. Factors in rat learning. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1937, 14, 1–41.Google Scholar