Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:39:19.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A General Approach to Procrustes Pattern Rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gunnar T. Gruvaeus*
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service

Abstract

A method is introduced for oblique rotation to a pattern target matrix specified in advance. The target matrix may have all or only some of its elements specified. Values are estimated by means of a general procedure for minimization with equality constraints. Results are shown using data from Harman and Browne.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is indebted to K. G. Jöreskog and M. W. Browne for many helpful suggestions and comments throughout the course of this study. Thanks are also due P. H. Schönemann and H. Weiner.

References

Browne, M. W. On oblique procrustes rotation. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 125132Google ScholarPubMed
Browne, M. W., & Kristof, W. On the oblique rotation of a factor matrix to a specified pattern. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 237248Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., & Powell, M. J. D. A rapidly convergent descent method for minimization. Computer Journal, 1963, 2, 163168Google Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, Rev. ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967Google Scholar
Horst, A. P. A non-graphical method for transforming an arbitrary factor matrix into a simple structure factor matrix. Psychometrika, 1941, 6, 7999Google Scholar
Hurley, J. R., & Cattell, R. B. The procrustes program, producing direct rotation to test an hypothesized factor structure. Behavioral Science, 1962, 7, 258262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. On rotation to a specified simple structure, 1965, Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing ServiceGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 443482Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. Factor transformation methods. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964, 17, 97103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosier, C. I. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known. Psychometrika, 1939, 4, 149162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple factor analysis, 1947, Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar