Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T19:34:30.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Guttman-Harris Uniqueness Estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Edward P. Meyer
Edward P. Meyer*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago Illinois Drug Abuse Program*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that, under very general conditions, uniqueness estimates proposed independently by Guttman [1957] and by Harris [1963] provide tighter upper bounds on the unknown uniqueness values of factor analysis than do existing estimates.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 1973 , pp. 371 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The Illinois Department of Mental Health Drug Abuse Program is co-sponsored by the State of Illinois and the Department of Psychiatry, Division of the Biological Sciences and Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago. Send reprint requests to Drug Abuse Programs–Research, East Pavilion, Museum of Science and Industry, 57th Street and South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60637.

References

Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. Communalities that maximize determinacy. Berkeley: University of California Research Report 16, Contr. No. AF41(657)-76, 1957.Google Scholar
Harris, C. W. Canonical factor models for the description of change. In Harris, C. W. (Eds.), Problems in Measuring Change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 1963, 138–155.Google Scholar