We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
L. Delbeke. Construction of Preference Spaces. Louvain-Leuven, Belgium: Publications of the University of Louvain (Studia Psychologica series), 1968. Pp. vi + 180. $8.20
Review products
L. Delbeke. Construction of Preference Spaces. Louvain-Leuven, Belgium: Publications of the University of Louvain (Studia Psychologica series), 1968. Pp. vi + 180. $8.20
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
01 January 2025
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Bechtel, G.Individual differences in the linear multidimensional scaling of choice. Paper presented at meeting of the Psychometric Society, Princeton, N. J., April, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. F. & Hays, W. L.Multidimensional unfolding: Determining the dimensionality of ranked preference data. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. D.Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In Shepard, R. N. and Romney, A. K. (Eds.) Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J. J.Non-parametric multidimensional analysis of paired-comparisons data. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Psychometric and Psychonomic Societies, Niagara Falls, October, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, C. H.A theory of data, 1964, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. & Kao, R. C.On a connection between factor analysi and multidimensional unfolding. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, T. C.A general model for non-metric multidimensional scaling. Michigan Mathematical Psychology Program (MMPP 67-3), 1967.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, H.Intercultural studies of attitudes. In Frederiksen, N. & Gulliksen, H. (Eds.), Contributions to Mathematical Psychology. New York: Holt. 1964, 64–108.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. & Carroll, J. D.Geometric models and badness-of-fit functions. In Krishnaiah, P. R. (Eds.), Multivariate Analysis II. New York: Academic Press. 1969, 639–670.Google Scholar
Lingoes, J. C.An IBM-7090 program for Guttman-Lingoes smallest space analysis—RI. Behavioral Science, 1966, 11, 332–332.Google Scholar
Rodgers, D. A.A fast approximate algebraic factor rotation method to maximize agreement between factor loadings and predetermined weights. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskam, E. I.Metric analysis of ordinal data in psychology: Models and numerical methods for metric analysis of conjoint ordinal data in psychology, 1968, Voorschoten, Holland: University of Leiden Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. & Cliff, N.A generalization of the interpoint distance model. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöneman, P. H.On metric multidimensional unfolding. Psychometrika. In press.Google Scholar
Slater, P.The analysis of personal preferences. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1960, 13, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R.Intra-individual and inter-individual multidimensionality. In Gulliksen, H. & Messick, S. (Eds.), Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Wiley. 1960, 155–167.Google Scholar
Young, F. W. & Torgerson, W. S.TORSCA, A FORTRAN IV program for Shepard-Kruskal multidimensional scaling analysis. Behavioral Science, 1967, 12, 498–498.Google Scholar