Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:42:14.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

META_SAS: A Method for Detecting Moderators After a Meta-Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Abraham Sagie  and
Meni Koslowsky
Abraham Sagie
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration and Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Meni Koslowsky
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration and Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Announcement
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 316 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Psychometric Society

References

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Levine, E. L. (1987). Meta-Analysis for integrating study outcomes: A Monte Carlo study of its susceptibility to Type I and Type II errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (1982). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Whitener, E. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar