Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:48:13.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Method for the Study of Interstimulus Similarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Clyde H. Coombs
Clyde H. Coombs*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A generalized method for collecting data on interstimulus similarity is presented and its special cases evaluated by use of information theory. A method of analyzing the data by the Unfolding Technique is presented which permits the study of the latent attribute structure underlying the similarity of stimuli for a single individual.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 1954 , pp. 183 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was carried out under Office of Naval Research Contract Nonr 374 (00) NR 041-011.

References

Attneave, Fred. A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychological Review, 1949, 56, 334–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, J. F. A method for determining the dimensionality of a set of rank-orders. Unpublished doctor's dissertation, University of Michigan, 1951.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychological Review, 1950, 57, 145–158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombs, C. H. A theory of psychological scaling. Engineering Research Bulletin, (University of Michigan Press), 1952, No. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L., Thurstone, L. L. An internal consistency check for scale values determined by the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936Google Scholar
Klingberg, F. L. Studies in measurement of the relations among sovereign states. Psychometrika, 1941, 6, 335–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. W. Multidimensional psychophysics. Psychological Bulletin, 1938, 35, 659–660Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 1927, 34, 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar