Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T15:26:32.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Monotonically Convergent Algorithm for Factals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Henk A. L. Kiers*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Yoshio Takane
Affiliation:
McGill University
Ab Mooijaart
Affiliation:
Leiden University
*
Request for reprints should be sent to Henk A. L. Kiers, Department of Psychology, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, THE NETHERLANDS.

Abstract

Takane, Young, and de Leeuw proposed a procedure called FACTALS for the analysis of variables of mixed measurement levels (numerical, ordinal, or nominal). Mooijaart pointed out that their algorithm does not necessarily converge, and Nevels proposed a new algorithm for the case of nominal variables. In the present paper it is shown that Nevels' procedure is incorrect, and a new procedure for handling nominal variables is proposed. In addition, a procedure for handling ordinal variables is proposed. Using these results, a monotonically convergent algorithm is constructed for FACTALS of any mixture of variables.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors are obliged to Jos ten Berge for stimulating comments on an earlier version of this paper. The research of H. A. L. Kiers has been made possible by a fellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. The research of Y. Takane has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, grant number A6394, and by the McGill-IBM Cooperative Grant.

References

de Leeuw, J., Young, F. W., & Takane, Y. (1976). Additive structure in qualitative data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 41, 471503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Harman, H. H., & Fukuda, Y. (1966). Resolution of the Heywood case in the MINRES solution. Psychometrika, 31, 563571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H., & Jones, W. H. (1966). Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (MINRES). Psychometrika, 31, 351368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kiers, H. A. L. (1990). Majorization as a tool for optimizing a class of matrix functions. Psychometrika, 55, 417428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulman, J. J. (1968). A distance approach to nonlinear multivariate analysis, Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
Mooijaart, A. (1984). The nonconvergence of FACTALS: A nonmetric common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 143145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nevels, K. (1989). An improved solution for FACTALS: a nonmetric common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 54, 339343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J. (1979). Nonmetric common factor analysis: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Behaviormetrika, 6, 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Berge, J. M. F., & Nevels, K. (1977). A general solution to Mosier's oblique Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 42, 593600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. W., Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1978). The principal components of mixed measurement level multivariate data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 43, 279281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar