Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-96s6r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:40:47.007Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multidimensional Analysis of Complex Structure: Mixtures of Class and Quantitative Variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Richard Degerman
Richard Degerman*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For certain kinds of structure consisting of quantitative dimensions superimposed on a discrete class structure, spatial representations can be viewed as being composed of two subspaces, the first of which reveals the discrete classes as isolated clusters and the second of which contains variation along the quantitative attributes. A numerical method is presented for rotating a multi-dimensional configuration or factor solution so that the first few axes span the space of classes and the remaining axes span the space of quantitative variation. The use of this method is then illustrated in the analysis of some experimental data.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 1970 , pp. 475 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is particulary indebted to Dr. W. S. Torgerson for many valuable suggestions. In addition, Mr. M. David Todd and Mr. Joseph Young provided technical assistance in developing several assembly language routines, and Dr. James E. Deese made a number of helpful comments. This research was undertaken in partial fulfillment of the doctoral requirements at Johns Hopkins University, and was financed in part by the National Science Foundation.

References

Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. Multivariate procedures for the behavioral sciences, 1962, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Forgy, E. W. Evaluation of several methods for detecting mixtures from different N-dimensional populations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, 1964.Google Scholar
Fox, B. L., & Landi, D. M. An algorithm for identifying the ergodic subchains and transient states of a stochastic matrix. Rand Corporation Memorandum RM-5269-PR, March 1967.Google Scholar
Garner, W. R. Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts, 1962, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe: Free Press. 1954, 258–345Google Scholar
Guttman, L. The nonmetric breakthrough for the behavioral sciences. Proceedings, Second National Conference on Data Processing, Rehovoth, January 1966.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 469–506Google Scholar
Hadley, G. Linear algebra, 1961, Reading, Mass.: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Halmos, P. E. Finite dimensional vector spaces, 1958, Princeton: Van NostrandGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 241–254Google ScholarPubMed
Kruskal, J. B., & Hart, R. E. A geometric interpretation of diagnostic data for a digital machine: Based on a study of the Morris, Illinois Electronic Central Office. Bell System Technical Journal, 1966, 45, 1299–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuitty, L. L. A novel application of the coefficient of correlation in the isolation of both typal and dimensional constructs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1967, 27, 591–599Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 338–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, A. S. Similarity as a determinant of friendship: A multi-dimensional study, 1959, Ann Arbor, Mich.: University MicrofilmsGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. Optimal classification into groups: An approach for solving the taxonomy problem. IBM New York Scientific Center Report No. 320-2915, November 1967.Google Scholar
Sawrey, W. L., Keller, L., & Conger, J. J. An objective method of grouping profiles by distance functions and its relation to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960, 20, 651–673Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Psychological representation of speech sounds. In David, E. E. & Denes, P. B. (Eds.) Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Multidimensional representation of similarity structures. In Katz, M. M., Cole, J. O., & Barton, W. E. (Eds.), The role and methodology of classification in psychiatry and psychopathology. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. 1968, 212–220Google Scholar
Wickelgren, W. Distinctive features and errors in short term memory for English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966, 39, 388–398Google ScholarPubMed
Young, F. W., & Torgerson, W. S. TORSCA, A FORTRAN IV program for Shepard-Kruskal multidimensional scaling analysis. Behavioral Science, 1967, 12, 498–498Google Scholar
Young, G., & Householder, A. S. Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 19–22Google Scholar