Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-rcs6z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T13:46:22.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Solution to the Additive Constant Problem in Metric Multidimensional Scaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Lee G. Cooper
Lee G. Cooper*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new solution to the additive constant problem in metric multidimensional scaling is developed. This solution determines, for a given dimensionality, the additive constant and the resulting stimulus projections on the dimensions of a Euclidean space which minimize the sum of squares of discrepancies between the formal model for metric multidimensional scaling and the original data. A modification of Fletcher-Powell style functional iteration is used to compute solutions. A scale free index of the goodness of fit is developed to aid in selecting solutions of adequate dimensionality from multiple candidates.

Keywords

Public PolicyOriginal DataEuclidean SpaceFormal ModelStatistical Theory

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 1972 , pp. 311 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research is based in part on the author’s Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Computer time was provided by the Campus Computing Network of the University of California, Los Angeles.

References

Cliff, N. Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. G. Metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling—a confrontation. Paper presented to the Pacific Association for Public Opinion Research, January, 1970a.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. G. Metric multidimensional scaling and the concept of preference, 1970, Los Angeles: Western Management science Institute, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
Eckart, C., Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, R. and Powell, M. J. A rapidly converging descent method for minimization. Computer Journal, 1963, 2, 163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruvaeus, G. T. and Jöreskog, K. G. A computer program for minimizing a function of several variables. Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin. RB-70-14, 1970.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. J. and Abelson, R. P. The additive constant problem in multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, A. A first course in numerical analysis, 1965, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 1966, 21, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. and Carroll, R. Fitting one matrix to another under choice of central dilation and rigid motion. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. Nonparametric statistics, 1956, New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis. Technical Report, University of Illinois, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. and Messick, S. An individual difference model for multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 333–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. W. and Torgerson, W. S. TORSCA, A FORTRAN IV program for Shepard-Kruskal multidimensional scaling analysis. Behavioral Science, 1967, 12, 498–498Google Scholar