Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:33:29.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear Submodels of Orthogonal Linear Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gordon G. Bechtel*
Affiliation:
Oregon Research Institute* Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study

Abstract

A model containing linear and nonlinear parameters (e. g., a spatial multidimensional scaling model) is viewed as a linear model with free and constrained parameters. Since the rank deficiency of the design matrix for the linear model determines the number of side conditions needed to identify its parameters, the design matrix acts as a guide in identifying the parameters of the nonlinear model. Moreover, if the design matrix and the uniqueness conditions constitute an orthogonal linear model, then the associated error sum of squares may be expressed in a form which separates the free and constrained parameters. This immediately provides least squares estimates of the free parameters, while simplifying the least squares problem for those which are constrained. When the least squares estimates for a nonlinear model are obtained in this way, i.e. by conceptualizing it as a submodel, the final error sum of squares for the nonlinear model will be a restricted minimum whenever the side conditions of the model become real restrictions upon its submodel. In this case the design matrix for the embracing orthogonal model serves as a guide in introducing parameters into the nonlinear model as well as in identifying these parameters. The method of overwriting a nonlinear model with an orthogonal linear model is illustrated with two different spatial analyses of a three-way preference table.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The initial version of this paper appeared as Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin 71–11. This work was also supported by grants MH 12972 and MH 15506 to the Oregon Research Institute from the National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service. The present reformulation of this work was carried out at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study, where the author is indebted to Pilar van Breda-Burgueño for the preparation of the manuscript.

References

Bechtel, G. G., & Chaplin, W. Multidimensional unfolding of interval utility and similarity scales. Oregon Research Institute Research Bulletin, 1971, Vol. 11, No. 11.Google Scholar
Bechtel, G. G., Tucker, L. R, & Chang, W. A scalar product model for the multidimensional scaling of choice. Psychometrika, 1971, 36, 369388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, R. and Powell, M. J. D. A rapidly convergent descent method for minimization. The Computer Journal, 1963, 6, 163168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollob, H. F. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 73115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Householder, A. S. and Young, G. Matrix approximation and latent roots. American Mathematical Monthly, 1938, 45, 165171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. M. On a theorem stated by Eckart and Young. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 259263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. B. Factorization of matrices by least-squares. Biometrika, 1962, 49, 239242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffé, H. The analysis of variance, 1959, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 279311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittle, P. On principal components and least square methods of factor analysis. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 1952, 35, 223239Google Scholar