Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T00:02:44.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nontruncated Marginal of a Truncated Bivariate Normal Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Barry C. Arnold
Affiliation:
Department of statistics, University of California, Riverside
Robert J. Beaver
Affiliation:
Department of statistics, University of California, Riverside
Richard A. Groeneveld*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
William Q. Meeker
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Richard A. Groeneveld, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Abstract

Inference is considered for the marginal distribution of X, when (X, Y) has a truncated bivariate normal distribution. The Y variable is truncated, but only the X values are observed. The relationship of this distribution to Azzalini's “skew-normal” distribution is obtained. Method of moments and maximum likelihood estimation are compared for the three-parameter Azzalini distribution. Samples that are uniformative about the skewness of this distribution may occur, even for large n. Profile likelihood methods are employed to describe the uncertainty involved in parameter estimation. A sample of 87 Otis test scores is shown to be well-described by this model.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, M. A. (1964). Correlation in a singly truncated bivariate normal distribution. Psychometrika, 29, 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzalini, A. (1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 12, 171178.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Z. W. (1950). Effect of linear truncation on a multinormal population. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 272279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartinhour, J. (1990). One-dimensional marginal density functions of a truncated multivariate normal density function. Communications in Statistics, Part A—Theory and Methods, 19, 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, Y-M., & Owen, D. B. (1984). An approximation to the percentiles of a variable of the bivariate normal distribution when the other variable is truncated, with applications. Communications in Statistics, Part A—Theory and Methods, 13, 25352547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. C. (1950). Estimating the mean and variance of normal populations from singly truncated and doubly truncated samples. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 557569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. C. (1955). Restriction and selection in samples from bivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 884893.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. C. (1991). Truncated and Censored Samples: Theory and Applications, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Dennis, J. E., Gay, D. M., & Welsch, R. E. (1981). An adaptive nonlinear least-squares algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 7, 348383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henze, N. (1986). A probabilistic representation of the ‘skew-normal’ distribution. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 13, 271275.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. P., & Lai, C. D. (1990). Continuous bivariate distributions, emphasizing applications, Adelaide, South Australia: Rambsby Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. V. (1988). Data analysis for managers with Minitab, Redwood City, CA: Scientific Press.Google Scholar
S-PLUS reference manual. (1990). Seattle, WA: Statistical Sciences.Google Scholar
Zacks, S. (1981). Parametric statistical inference, Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar