Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-8qdnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T22:45:56.273Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

A Note on the Identification of Restricted Factor Loading Matrices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Paul A. Bekker*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Tilburg University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Paul A. Bekker, Tilburg University, Department of Econometrics, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, THE NETHERLANDS.

Abstract

It is shown that problems of rotational equivalence of restricted factor loading matrices in orthogonal factor analysis are equivalent to problems of identification in simultaneous equations systems with covariance restrictions. A necessary (under a regularity assumption) and sufficient condition for local uniqueness is given and a counterexample is provided to a theorem by J. Algina concerning necessary and sufficient conditions for global uniqueness.

Type
Notes And Comments
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The problem in this note should not be confused with the related problem of underidentification of factor loading matrices due to underidentification of unique variances. A clear discussion of that distinction was given by K. A. Bollen and K. G. Jöreskog (1985, Uniqueness does not imply identification, Sociological Methods and Research, 14, 155–163).

The author would like to thank Arie Kapteyn for his comments and suggestions. Financial support by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (ZWO) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Algina, J. (1980). A note on identification in the oblique and orthogonal factor analysis models. Psychometrika, 45, 393396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balestra, P. (1976). La Derivation Matricielle [Matrix differentiation], Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Bekker, P. A., Pollock, D. S. G. (1986). Identification of linear stochastic models with covariance restrictions. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 179208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. E. (1973). A note on a sufficiency condition for uniqueness of a restricted factor matrix. Psychometrika, 38, 141143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, F. M. (1966). The identification problem in econometrics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. F., Singleton, K. J. (1981). Maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis of economic time series. International Economic Review, 22, 3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberger, A. S. (1971). Econometrics and psychometrics: A survey of communalities. Psychometrika, 36, 83107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J. A., Newey, W., Taylor, W. (1983). Efficient estimation and identification of simultaneous equation models with covariance restrictions, Boston: MIT.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. (1978). Rotational equivalence of factor loading matrices with specified values. Psychometrika, 43, 421426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, J. R., Neudecker, H. (1979). The commutation matrix: Some properties and applications. The Annals of Statistics, 7, 381394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. (1985). Identifiability of factor analysis: some results and open problems. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A., Browne, M. W. (1983). On the investigation of local identifiability, a counterexample. Psychometrika, 48, 303304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar