Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-sbzbt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T06:51:42.082Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

A Note on the use of Triads for Paired Comparisons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

R. E. Schucker*
Affiliation:
Purdue University

Abstract

When scaling a large number of stimuli from comparative judgments, considerable savings in time and labor may be realized if stimuli are presented in triad form rather than in pairs. If, for N stimuli, the proper configuration of triads can be assembled so that all possible pairs appear once, the paired judgment matrix may be reproduced with one-third fewer judgments and two-thirds fewer presentations than would be required with complete pairing. A simple procedure is described for enumerating triad configurations for which N is an odd multiple of three.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, W. W. R. Mathematical recreations and essays (11th ed.), London: Macmillan, 1939.Google Scholar
Cox, G. M. Enumeration and construction of balanced incomplete block configurations. Ann. math. Statist., 1940, 11, 7285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kephart, N. C. and Oliver, J. E. A punched card procedure for use with the method of paired comparison. J. appl. Psychol., 1952, 36, 4748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuder, F. G. Examiner manual for the Kuder Preference Record, Chicago: Sci. Res. Associates, 1953.Google Scholar
McCormick, E. J.and Bachus, J. A. Paired comparison ratings. II: The reliability of ratings based on partial pairings. J. appl. Psychol., 1952, 36, 188192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J. E. A punched card procedure for use with partial pairing. J. appl. Psychol., 1953, 37, 129130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar