Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-96s6r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:22:09.290Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

On Estimation of Parameters in Latent Structure Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

T. W. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Columbia University

Abstract

The latent structure model considered here postulates that a population of individuals can be divided into m classes such that each class is “homogeneous” in the sense that for the individuals in the class the responses to N dichotomous items or questions are statistically independent. A method is given for deducing the proportions of the population in each latent class and the probabilities of positive responses to each item for individuals in each class from knowledge of the probabilities of positive responses for individuals from the population as a whole. For estimation of the latent parameters on the basis of a sample, it is proposed that the same method of analysis be applied to the observed data. The method has the advantages of avoiding implicitly defined and unobservable quantities, and of using relatively simple computational procedures of conventional matrix algebra, but it has the disadvantages of using only a part of the available information and of using that part asymmetrically.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Work supported by the RAND Corporation.

References

Stouffer, S. A. et al. Measurement and prediction, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. The use of mathematical models in the measurement of attitudes. Research Memorandum RM-455, RAND Corp., March 22, 1951.Google Scholar
Green, Bert. A general solution for the latent class model of latent structure analysis. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 151166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neyman, J.. Contribution to the theory of the x 2-test, Berkeley: Univ. California Press, 1949Google Scholar